Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of patient vital signs monitor accessories II

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
167196
Value
€170,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 05, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€170,000
Duration
48 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of patient vital signs monitor accessories II

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--[Submission requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[The document 'Tehniskā' contains a technical and financial offer form.]
--[The regulations for the open tender are contained in the document 'Nolikums'.]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Exclusion conditions are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Selection criteria are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Technical requirements for the supply of accessories for patient vital signs monitors are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[Specific accessories for Philips patient monitors are listed with zero cost in the document 'Tehniskā']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--[Financial offer requirements are outlined in the document 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
--[The document 'Tehniskā' lists various accessories for Philips patient monitors with zero cost, implying financial aspects are to be detailed in the offer.]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167196_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260305050851.pdf -- 94.5 KB

This document outlines the procurement requirements for the supply of accessories for patient vital signs monitors, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_.docx -- 101.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender for the supply of patient vital signs monitor accessories, ID No. PSKUS 2026/8, issued by VSIA "Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca".

TehniskāXLS
Pacientu vitālo funkciju monitoru piederumu p... -- 56.6 KB

This document contains a technical and financial offer form for the tender "Supply of Patient Vital Signs Monitor Accessories II", listing various accessories for Philips patient monitors with zero cost.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender PSKUS 2026/8 concerning the supply of patient vital signs monitor accessories, including deadlines and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for patient vital signs monitor accessories is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has some concerns regarding document access and sustainability integration.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a proper CPV code (though broad), and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description is concise, and requirements are documented within referenced files. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated in the main tender notice, which is a point of concern for clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the reliance on external documents for detailed requirements and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria reduce overall completeness.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting fairness. Access to all necessary documents is expected, though the 'Issues' section flags restricted access. Objective criteria are implied but not explicitly detailed, and the value is disclosed.

Restricted document access flagged
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which contradicts the e-procurement characteristic and raises a significant practicality concern. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission indicated
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The CPV code is present.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear basic information and reference number
Reasonable timeline and contract duration
Estimated value disclosed
Open procedure with e-procurement characteristic
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Contradiction regarding e-submission
Lack of sustainability integration

Recommendations

1. Clearly state evaluation criteria within the tender notice or accessible documents.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and ensure it aligns with e-procurement characteristics.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline