Skip to main content
Tenders

Modernization of the Municipal Health Clinic in Rzgów

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00160958/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Łódzkie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Łódzkie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Modernization of the Municipal Health Clinic in Rzgów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de84ee-711c-232a-056e-e500011b79da.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for construction works related to the modernization of the Municipal Health Center in Rzgów, Poland, including design and build services for the facility and RTG equipment.

SWZ.docxDOC
SWZ.docx

This document contains the Specification of the Works (SWZ) for the modernization of the Municipal Health Center in Rzgów, Poland, including design and construction services under a "design and build" contract.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the modernization of a municipal health center offers a comprehensive set of documents but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and disclosure of the estimated value. The process appears generally compliant with procurement rules.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to follow standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and a defined organization. The mention of 'None' for the procedure type is unusual and requires clarification to ensure it aligns with applicable regulations. Assuming 'None' implies a standard open procedure or equivalent, compliance is generally good. The lack of disclosed disputes is positive.

Procedure type indicated as 'None' requires clarification regarding its regulatory compliance.
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear. The availability of 13 documents, including the SWZ and technical specifications, suggests detailed requirements. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a submission deadline. The value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. A substantial number of documents (13) are provided, indicating thoroughness in outlining technical and administrative aspects.

Estimated value is not disclosed.
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes accessibility. The full document access is positive. However, the absence of a disclosed estimated value can be a concern for bidders assessing the project's scale and their capacity. The requirements themselves, as listed, appear standard and not tailored to specific companies.

Estimated value is not disclosed, potentially impacting fair assessment of project scale.
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. The contract start date and duration are not explicitly stated, which is a practical drawback for planning. Financing information is also missing.

Contract start date is not specified.
Contract duration is not specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The tender is active and has no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information. While EU funding is not specified, it's common for such projects to have it. The lack of dedicated sustainability criteria results in a moderate score.

No specific criteria for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation are mentioned.

Strengths

Comprehensive set of 13 tender documents provided
Clear title, reference number, and organization details
E-Procurement enabled for accessibility
No reported disputes or suspensions

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Contract start date and duration missing
Ambiguity regarding the 'Procedure: None' status

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bid submissions.
3. Specify the contract start date and duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline