Skip to main content
Tenders

Finance Solutions

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022383-2026
Value
£240,000,000
Location
Inner London - East, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£240,000,000
Duration
24 months
Location
Inner London - East
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

NHS Supply Chain intends to launch a National Framework Agreement for the provision of flexible financing solutions, including Residual Value Leases, Non-Residual Value Leases, Loans, and Sale and Leaseback Agreements. This will cover the facilitating of financing essential medical and non-medical assets for NHS Trusts.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Finance Solutions is generally well-structured with a clear description and sufficient basic information. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure (Open procedure), a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. The absence of specific regulatory flags suggests general compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the 'Finance Solutions' framework is clear, outlining the types of financing and the purpose. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements makes it difficult for potential bidders to fully understand the assessment process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of content for the tender documents and the lack of specified submission requirements reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Missing submission requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for division into parts are mentioned. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, promoting fairness. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details could be a minor concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of information regarding financing sources or green/social aspects limit its practicality for bidders seeking comprehensive project understanding.

No e-submission specified
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated consistently. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
Open procedure for broad participation
Clear description of services

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of specific submission requirements
No explicit e-submission details

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Upload full tender documents with content and specify submission procedures.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline