Skip to main content
Tenders

Lift Voice alarm system

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019772-2026
Value
£100,000
Location
Merseyside, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 05, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 10, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£100,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Merseyside
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Replacement of existing TVCL emergency lift alarm monitoring system with a new 4g digital solution. The works will involve the replacement of the existing 2G communication device and the installation of a DCP to each lift

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Replacement of existing TVCL emergency lift alarm monitoring system with a new 4g digital solution.
--Replacement of the existing 2G communication device.
--Installation of a DCP to each lift.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a lift voice alarm system replacement is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, and the submission process could be more streamlined.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the required works is clear, outlining the replacement of an existing system with a new 4G digital solution and specific installation tasks. However, the lack of detailed technical specifications and explicit evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. However, the absence of detailed requirements and attached documents limits completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, financial, submission)
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for selection are objective in principle, though not explicitly detailed. The lack of specific requirements tailored to particular companies is positive.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the availability of document URLs could hinder practical application for bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission mentioned
Financing information not detailed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Specified estimated value and deadline
CPV code provided
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Lack of detailed technical and evaluation criteria
No document content available for review
Potential for a short submission deadline
Limited emphasis on sustainability

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical specifications and clear evaluation criteria.
2. Upload full tender documents for bidder review.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline