Skip to main content
Tenders

Poland – Diffraction apparatus – Delivery of an X-ray diffractometer with equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow (DZP.260.11.2026)

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/S 50-170900
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Poland
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€220,298
Avg. Bids
0.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
12,304 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Poland – Diffraction apparatus – Delivery of an X-ray diffractometer with equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow (DZP.260.11.2026)

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7fd5-0378-7aa8-056e-e50001ac7314.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply, installation, and commissioning of an X-ray diffractometer with equipment for the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Krakow, Poland.

SWZ_spektrometr_dyfraktometr.docxDOC
SWZ_spektrometr_dyfraktometr.docx

This document contains the terms of reference for the supply of an X-ray diffractometer with equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow.

Zalacznik_nr_1.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_1.docx

This document contains detailed technical specifications for a new X-ray diffractometer, including its base unit, beam-forming elements, and various sample stages for different temperature and measurement conditions.

Zalacznik_nr_2.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_2.docx

This document contains a bid form for a tender concerning the supply of an X-ray diffractometer with equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow.

Zalacznik_nr_3.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_3.docx

This document contains a price form template for submitting a bid, requiring detailed unit and total pricing including VAT, to be filled out by the bidder.

Zalacznik_nr_4.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_4.docx

This document contains a bidder's declaration concerning exclusion grounds related to EU sanctions and national security, to be filled and submitted as part of the tender for the supply of X-ray diffractometer equipment.

Zalacznik_nr_5.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_5.docx

This document contains the essential provisions of a contract for the delivery, installation, and commissioning of an X-ray diffractometer, including software, equipment, and training, funded by the European Commission.

Zalacznik_nr_6.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_6.docx

This document is a template for a commitment from a third party to provide necessary resources to the contractor for the execution of the order.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an X-ray diffractometer is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable overall process, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial disclosure.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance principles, with a clear CPV code (though noted as N/A initially, it is provided in brackets), and a defined submission deadline. The presence of a draft contract and various required forms indicates procedural clarity. However, the absence of stated evaluation criteria and potential issues with deadline reasonableness could slightly impact compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the tender is clear, and the attached documents, including technical specifications and contract drafts, provide detailed information. The requirements are largely documented through the provided templates. The main clarity concern is the absence of explicit evaluation criteria, leaving bidders to infer the weighting of different aspects.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, description, and submission deadline. Contract duration is specified. A significant number of relevant documents are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a key piece of information for completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, offering full access to all necessary documents and specifying the e-procurement characteristic. The disclosure of the contract duration and the existence of various form templates suggest an objective approach. There are no obvious indicators of requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of disclosed value slightly detracts from maximum fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender leverages e-procurement, which is a positive practical aspect. The contract start date is not explicitly stated but can be inferred from the duration and deadline. Financing information is implied through EU funding mentioned in document summaries. The short contract duration of 6 months might pose practical challenges for complex installations.

Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and submission deadline are well-populated. There are no disclosed disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical. The CPV code is provided within brackets, enhancing data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender details. While the funding source is stated as the European Commission (implying potential adherence to broader EU directives), specific sustainability criteria are not detailed within the provided tender information.

No explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria mentioned

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation provided
Clear technical specifications and contract draft
Utilizes e-procurement
Well-defined organizational and descriptive information

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Potential for a short contract duration to be impractical

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to improve transparency and bidder assessment.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria and their weighting to ensure fairness and clarity for bidders.
3. Consider if the 6-month contract duration is sufficient for the delivery, installation, and commissioning of the diffractometer.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline