Skip to main content
Tenders

EU_1306 - ESP IT Outsourced Services

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026562-2026
Value
£48,000
Location
Inner London - East, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 07, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£48,000
Duration
7 months
Location
Inner London - East
Type
Open Procedure
71
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

British Council está buscando un proveedor que pueda aportar servicios de soporte de IT según las especificaciones definidas en el punto 7

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

71
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for IT Outsourced Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed document content, impacting clarity and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a reference number, organization, and CPV code. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'. However, the absence of a reveal date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks regarding transparency and procedural fairness.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity70/100

The description is concise, referencing point 7 for detailed specifications. While the core service is identified, the lack of accessible document content or a clear summary of requirements within the tender notice itself reduces overall clarity. The AI-extracted requirements list is generic.

No document content available
Vague description of detailed specifications
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. The contract duration and start date are also specified. However, the lack of accessible detailed tender documents significantly impacts completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while short, is specified. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which is a concern for fairness, but the general nature of the service and open competition format lean towards fairness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality60/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission details and the lack of accessible document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not indicate any immediate logical conflicts.

Sustainability30/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Estimated value and deadline disclosed
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing detailed evaluation criteria
No accessible document content
Short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria for transparency.
2. Make full tender documents accessible or provide summaries.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects in future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline