Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login6 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
3 documents available with AI summaries
This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the development of a queue management software solution for Rīgas 1. slimnīca, including selection criteria and other necessary documents.
This document contains an application form for participation in a procurement tender for the development of a queue management software solution.
This document contains the basic data for a tender concerning the development of a queue management solution software, with a submission deadline of April 13, 2026.
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
This tender for queue management software development is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting transparency.
The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect legal compliance if subjective assessments are made.
The title and description are clear. The existence of a technical specification document suggests detailed requirements are available, though not fully summarized. The main tender page and application form are identified.
Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are listed, with one being the technical specification. However, the summary does not confirm if all necessary documents for submission are explicitly detailed or attached.
The estimated value is disclosed, and the process is open. The use of e-procurement is noted. However, restricted document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria raise concerns about complete transparency and objective assessment.
The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. The contract duration is specified. However, the summary does not explicitly mention financing information or a clear contract start date, and the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks suggests a potential issue with the submission process itself.
Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical, with the reveal date preceding the submission and opening dates.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required