Skip to main content
Tenders

Tree trunk protectors and plant supports

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168515
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 17, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Warranty periodQuality
Delivery time (Parts 1 and 3)Timeline
Delivery and installation time (Part 2)Timeline
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
69
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€168,348
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
4,060 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Tree trunk protectors and plant supports

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (6)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Submission deadline: 2026-04-01T09:00:00
--The tender is for the supply of tree trunk protectors and plant supports.
--The tender is divided into three parts.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements mentioned in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Part 1: Supply of metal plant supports.
--Part 2: Manufacturing and installation of metal tree trunk protectors and plant supports.
--Part 3: Supply of tree trunk protectors.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements mentioned in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168515_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260317181415.pdf -- 99.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of metal plant supports, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical specifications, and financial offer requirements.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168515_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260317181415.pdf -- 99.4 KB

This document outlines the technical and financial requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the manufacturing and installation of metal tree trunk protectors and plant supports.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
1_pielikums_Pieteikums_1.docx -- 44.8 KB

Summary generation failed

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.versijaHTM
Iepirkuma priekšmeta 3.daļas prasības, 1.vers...

No content extracted

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for the tender SIA RM 2026/24, which is for the supply of tree trunk protectors and plant supports, with a submission deadline of April 1, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

69
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for tree trunk protectors and plant supports has a clear structure and good documentation availability but lacks transparency in financial value and detailed evaluation criteria, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender has a clear procedure, a reasonable submission deadline, and a CPV code is provided. The organization is identified. While no explicit disputes are mentioned, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and potential restricted document access could be minor legal compliance concerns. The duration is short but potentially compliant.

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Clarity70/100

The description of the goods is clear, and the tender is divided into parts with specific technical requirements for each. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria leaves potential bidders uncertain about how their submissions will be judged.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100

Basic information like title, reference, organization, and deadline are present. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the full extent of required documentation or evaluation methodology is not clearly laid out in the summary, affecting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness75/100

The tender uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the undisclosed estimated value and potentially restricted document access could hinder fair competition. The technical requirements, while detailed for each part, do not appear to be tailored to specific companies, which is a positive aspect.

Value not disclosed
Restricted document access
Practicality60/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and while financing information is not detailed, it's common for such details to be in attached documents. The short contract duration of 1 month might be practical for the described supplies.

Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, deadline, and CPV code are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no mentions of suspension or disputes. The division into parts is clearly indicated.

Sustainability40/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the provided summary. The tender does not state if it is EU funded, suggesting a lack of explicit focus on sustainability or broader EU objectives.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of goods
Division into parts with specific requirements
E-procurement utilized
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline