Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Open
Deadline
27 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023144-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 28, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
14 months
Location
Lincolnshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Salix PSDS Phase 4 - Lincoln College Air Source Heat Pumps and Electrical Upgrades - Abbey Building, Friary Building and Temple Building

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for air source heat pumps and electrical upgrades at Lincoln College is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable process. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while specified, is noted as potentially short, which could impact legal compliance if it hinders fair competition.

Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements (exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) indicate a structured approach. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is present. Contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available, impacting overall completeness.

Value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The open procedure and clear categorization of requirements suggest a fair process. The disclosure of the contract duration and the use of a standard CPV code contribute to fairness. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date, and financing is implied through the Salix PSDS Phase 4 program. However, the absence of an e-submission option and the lack of document content reduce practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced. The 'active' status is consistent with the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While the nature of air source heat pumps suggests an environmental benefit, these aspects are not highlighted as procurement characteristics.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
CPV code and NUTS code specified
Requirements categorized (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Contract duration and start date specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available for review
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
3. Ensure sufficient time for the submission deadline, considering the scope of work.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline