Skip to main content
Tenders

Vale of White Horse District Council requires the services of an experienced Project Manager (EA - Employers Agent), to manage their Gym Extension and Wet Side Changing Facilities Projects at the Wantage Leisure Centre, Portway, Wantage

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
019350-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 04, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 26, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£60,000
Duration
12 months
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Vale of White Horse District Council requires the services of an experienced Project Manager (EA - Employers Agent), to manage their Gym Extension and Wet Side Changing Facilities Projects at the Wantage Leisure Centre, Portway, Wantage. All companies interested in quoting for this procurement should carefully read the tender documentation to fully understand the requirement before submitting a proposal.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (9)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Submit a proposal.
--Carefully read the tender documentation before submitting a proposal.
--ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Companies must be experienced Project Managers (EA - Employers Agent).
--Companies must be interested in quoting for this procurement.
--Companies must carefully read the tender documentation to fully understand the requirement before submitting a proposal.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Proven experience as a Project Manager (EA - Employers Agent).
--Experience relevant to managing Gym Extension and Wet Side Changing Facilities Projects.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for project management services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial evaluation criteria and detailed documentation content, impacting its overall completeness and clarity for potential bidders.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is for a below-threshold open competition, which is generally permissible. The CPV code is appropriate for construction management services. Deadlines are provided, and while they appear reasonable given the estimated value, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a reveal date could be a minor procedural concern.

Clarity80/100

The description of services required is clear, specifying the need for an experienced Project Manager (EA - Employers Agent) for gym extension and wet side changing facilities. Eligibility requirements are also reasonably outlined. However, the lack of detailed tender documentation content and unspecified evaluation criteria reduce overall clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Completeness70/100

Most basic information such as title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, duration, and deadline are present. However, the absence of detailed tender documentation content and a reveal date limits the completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

No document content available
Missing reveal date
Fairness85/100

The tender appears to be an open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria for eligibility and technical capability are generally objective. The deadline seems reasonable for the value. The main concern is the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, which, if overly subjective, could impact fairness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and there is no explicit mention of e-submission or document URLs, which are common in modern e-procurement systems.

No e-submission mentioned
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are populated consistently. There are no flags for suspension or disputes, and the dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are important aspects of modern sustainable procurement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and project description provided
Estimated value and duration disclosed
CPV code specified

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No detailed tender documentation content available
Lack of explicit e-submission process
No sustainability considerations mentioned

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed tender documentation with clear evaluation criteria.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and provide document URLs.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability and innovation aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline