Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of a RIB-type rescue boat for OSP Choczewo

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00163327/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pomorskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Pomorskie
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€851,206
Avg. Bids
1.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
88%
13,633 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Supply of a RIB-type rescue boat for OSP Choczewo

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85be-bd6b-54a0-056e-e500011b88be.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the supply of a RIB rescue boat for the Volunteer Fire Department in Choczewo, Poland.

SWZ Łódź.pdfPDF
SWZ Łódź.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the delivery of a RIB rescue boat to OSP Choczewo, outlining the tender procedure, subject of the order, and execution terms.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a RIB rescue boat is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a defined CPV code. However, the lack of disclosed value and evaluation criteria, along with a potentially short submission deadline, are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and active status. However, the absence of a revealed date and specified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks. The deadline, while active, might be considered short for a complex procurement.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the subject of the order is well-defined. The availability of the SWZ document provides detailed specifications. The main clarity issue stems from the unspecified evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and CPV code. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, impacting the overall completeness of the tender information.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with e-procurement characteristics and full document access. The criteria for eligibility and technical capability are mentioned as AI-extracted requirements, suggesting they are likely detailed within the SWZ. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a direct e-submission link and the missing contract start date and financing information reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission link provided
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical, with the submission deadline occurring after the tender's active status.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and description
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive tender documents available (SWZ, contract draft)
Active status and reference number provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Submission deadline potentially too short
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria clearly.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if feasible.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline