Skip to main content
Tenders

Quomps Splash Park - Operation, Servicing & Seasonal Maintenance Contract (2026-2029)

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027129-2026
Value
£148,800
Location
Dorset and Somerset, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£148,800
Duration
36 months
Location
Dorset and Somerset
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Christchurch Town Council is procuring a three-year contract (with an optional one-year extension) for the servicing, operation and maintenance of the Quomps Splash Park. The Contractor will provide all daily operational checks, water quality testing, chemical dosing, plant room operations, and public-facing readiness tasks throughout the seasonal operating period. The service includes two site visits per day during the open season, monthly microbiological testing using an accredited laboratory, annual deep cleaning and disinfection of the three water tanks, routine plant servicing, and reactive maintenance of pumps, filters, jets and controls. The Contractor must supply all chemicals, consumables, PPE, and specialist equipment required to deliver the service. The contract also includes seasonal commissioning, end-of-season decommissioning/winterisation, and winter call-outs for flooding or system protection. All work must comply with relevant UK water quality, safety, electrical and pool plant standards, and must be carried out by suitably competent personnel. The required services must be delivered in accordance with the detailed specification and service levels set out in the tender documents.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (20)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements are detailed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be suitably competent personnel.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS20
--Provide daily operational checks.
--Perform water quality testing.
--Manage chemical dosing.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the Quomps Splash Park operation and maintenance is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and a disclosed budget. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on submission procedures, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by specifying a CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is mentioned as a requirement for the contractor.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is detailed and comprehensive, outlining specific operational tasks, testing, maintenance, and supply requirements. The AI-extracted requirements further clarify the expected technical capabilities. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The description is thorough. However, the lack of available document content and specific submission requirements means crucial details for bidders are not immediately accessible, reducing overall completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for competence are mentioned. The procedure is below threshold, which typically implies a less complex but still open process. No specific company tailoring is evident.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content make the practical execution of the submission process less straightforward. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The contract start date is shortly after the submission deadline, which is reasonable. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, ensuring data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these important areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical requirements
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure
Relevant CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potential for a tight submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed tender documents with clear evaluation criteria.
2. Consider incorporating sustainability objectives into the tender.
3. Ensure sufficient time between publication and deadline for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline