Skip to main content
Tenders

City of London Boys School Cyclical works programme

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
016371-2026
Value
£17,400,000
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 22, 2026

Budget
£17,400,000
Duration
48 months
Location
London
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

A single supplier framework is proposed to be established for the appointment of a principal contractor to deliver years 1-4 (2026- 2030) of the four year cyclical works programme for CoL Boys School. The estimated contract value given at sections 31 and 32 is for the full duration of the contract including the maximum possible extensions. The estimated annual contract value is therefore £3,625,000.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Estimated annual contract value: £3,625,000
--Total estimated contract value (including maximum extensions): 17,400,000 EUR

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for cyclical works at the City of London Boys School is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, and does not explicitly address sustainability or innovation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, with a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, though the submission deadline could be tighter given the complexity. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the cyclical works programme and the framework approach is clear. The estimated annual and total contract values are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of content in the tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements reduce its completeness.

No document content available
No specific submission requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the process is not divided into parts, suggesting a fair opportunity for a single principal contractor. There are no apparent tailored requirements for specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of explicit financing details or a URL for documents hinder practical application for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common considerations in modern public procurement. This suggests a lack of focus on these important areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Well-defined estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure for broad participation
Logical data consistency

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit sustainability and innovation focus
No e-submission specified

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Provide access to the full content of tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability and innovation requirements where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline