Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of competition hurdles, high jump mat set with base and protective cover

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168333
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Vidzeme, Latvia
Published
March 16, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 16, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
Vidzeme
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€19,755
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
1,265 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of competition hurdles, high jump mat set with base and protective cover

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168333_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260316145003.pdf -- 95.5 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for the first part of a tender concerning the purchase of competition hurdles, high jump mats, and protective covers.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168333_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260316145003.pdf -- 95.5 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements for the second part of a tender concerning the purchase of high jump mats, bases, and protective covers.

Nolikums ONP 2026/18DOC
Nolikums_ONP 2026_18.docx -- 210.2 KB

This document contains the procurement regulations for the acquisition of competition barriers, a high jump mat set with a base, and a protective cover, identified as ONP 2026/18.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for procurement ONP 2026/18, which involves the purchase of competition hurdles, high jump mats, and protective covers, with a submission deadline of March 31, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for sports equipment is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the active status. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the goods is clear, and the attached documents provide specific technical requirements for different parts of the purchase. The conditions for participation are not explicitly detailed but are implied to be within the attached documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting a degree of fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the absence of specified evaluation criteria raise concerns about transparency and equal opportunity for all potential bidders.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a direct e-submission URL and the short contract duration of 1 month might present practical challenges for some suppliers.

No explicit e-submission URL provided
Short contract duration (1 month)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. The tender is also not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Detailed technical specifications provided in separate documents
Designated as E-Procurement
Reasonable submission deadline

Concerns

Estimated financial value not disclosed
Lack of specified evaluation criteria
Restricted document access flagged
Short contract duration

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the procurement.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Provide direct links for e-submission and clarify document access procedures.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline