Skip to main content
Tenders

UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
007315-2026
Value
£7,200,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

January 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 17, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£7,200,000,000
Duration
96 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
63
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tender Notice for UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

11 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (2)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit a Wales-specific questionnaire.
--Submit a mandatory declaration confirming no improper canvassing or lobbying.
--Submit a Certificate of Non Collusion.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Bidder must not have engaged in any improper canvassing or lobbying related to the tender process.
--Bidder must not have engaged in any collusive practices with other bidders in their tender submission.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Be eligible to participate in Phase 1 of the UK Leisure Framework tender.
--Be capable of operating and delivering construction services within the UK, as the framework is for the UK Leisure sector.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Demonstrate technical capability and experience in construction work for buildings related to leisure, sports, culture, lodging, and restaurants (CPV 45212000).
--Be capable of providing construction work and related services for leisure, sports, and cultural buildings.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are explicitly detailed in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

9 documents available with AI summaries

Lot L-2HTM
L-2.html

This document is an invitation to participate in Phase 1 of the tender for the UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034.

Lot L-3HTM
L-3.html

This document is a Wales-specific questionnaire required for submission to provide detailed information relevant to the UK Leisure Framework tender.

Lot L-4HTM
L-4.html

This document provides a list or description of the public sector bodies eligible to access and procure services through the UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034.

Lot L-5HTM
L-5.html

This document is a mandatory declaration confirming that the bidder has not engaged in any improper canvassing or lobbying related to the tender process.

Lot L-6HTM
L-6.html

This document is a Certificate of Non Collusion, requiring bidders to declare that their tender submission has been made without any collusive practices with other bidders.

OCDS RecordDOC
007315-2026_ocds_record.json

This OCDS record provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the planning notice for the UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034 tender by Denbighshire Leisure Ltd.

OCDS Release PackageDOC
007315-2026_ocds_release.json

This OCDS Release Package provides structured, machine-readable data detailing the UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034 tender, including buyer information and tender specifics.

Official PDF VersionPDF
007315-2026_official.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034, valued at an estimated £6 billion, seeking providers for construction work and related services for leisure, sports, and cultural buildings across the UK.

Tender NoticeHTM
007315-2026.html

This document is a tender notice for the UK Leisure Framework 2026-2034, seeking suppliers for construction work related to leisure, sports, culture, and multi-functional buildings, with an estimated value of £6 billion over an 8-10 year period.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides a solid foundation with clear basic information and a substantial estimated value, but it suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, particularly regarding evaluation criteria and e-submission.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV code, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Mandatory exclusion grounds are included. While the 'missing reveal date' is noted, it does not inherently indicate a legal non-compliance if the publication was timely. The lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant concern that impacts legal compliance regarding transparency.

Missing reveal date
Lack of explicitly detailed evaluation criteria
Clarity60/100

The general description is adequate, and some requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical capability) are clearly stated. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of explicit financial requirements significantly reduce the overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific financial requirements explicitly detailed
Completeness65/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is provided, and all listed documents are available. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of specific financial requirements and, most notably, the lack of defined evaluation criteria.

Missing evaluation criteria
No specific financial requirements explicitly detailed
Fairness50/100

The tender's value is disclosed, and the requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to understand the basis of assessment. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access and efficiency.

No evaluation criteria specified
No electronic submission (e-submission)
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which aids planning. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden and limiting accessibility for some bidders.

No electronic submission (e-submission)
Data Consistency80/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent (e.g., submission before contract start). The estimated value in EUR is consistent with the GBP value mentioned in document summaries. Minor inconsistencies include missing specific codes for type/procedure and the liable person.

Missing 'Liable Person'
Missing specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
Sustainability20/100

The tender explicitly lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which typically encourages higher sustainability standards, indicating a very low emphasis on sustainability considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information (title, organization, reference, value, duration)
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided
Value disclosed and not classified, promoting transparency
CPV code is appropriately assigned, defining the scope
No disputes or suspensions, indicating a stable process

Concerns

Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of specific financial requirements
No electronic submission option
No integration of green, social, or innovation procurement aspects
Missing 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness for all bidders.
2. Clarify specific financial requirements to provide a complete picture for potential suppliers.
3. Implement an electronic submission system to enhance accessibility and efficiency of the procurement process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline