Skip to main content
Tenders

Lift Modernisation Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021654-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£60,000
Duration
18 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Lift Modernisation Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy - for the two multi-storey car parks in Camberley.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lift modernization consultancy is generally well-structured with clear basic information. However, it lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold open competitions. Deadlines are provided, and the CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of a reveal date, which is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, specifying the subject and location. However, the absence of detailed requirements, eligibility criteria, and evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Completeness70/100

Essential information like title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are present. However, the lack of detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and accessible document content (only 4 documents listed with no summaries) makes the tender incomplete for a thorough assessment by bidders.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. The lack of specific requirements and evaluation criteria, while impacting clarity, does not inherently suggest bias towards specific companies. However, the absence of e-submission and detailed criteria could be improved.

No e-submission
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. However, the absence of e-submission and the lack of explicit financing information or clear document URLs for detailed requirements hinder practicality for bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are consistent. The contract start date is shortly after the submission deadline, which is reasonable.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these common sustainability drivers.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Reference number and organization specified
Estimated value and deadlines disclosed
Appropriate CPV code provided

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria
No document content available for review
Absence of e-submission
No explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are accessible and contain sufficient information.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline