RFQ 2025/70 - NMANDD PEACEPLUS “Thriving Together” - PEACEPLUS 3.7 Reimagining the History of Mental Health Care in Down

This tender is generally well-structured with clear objectives and requirements, though it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content. The estimated value is low, and the duration is reasonable.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for below-threshold procurements. Deadlines are provided, and the procedure is open competition. The CPV code is general but acceptable for the service. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of a reveal date, which is a minor procedural omission.

The description of the programme is clear and detailed, outlining the project's goals, target audience, and expected outcomes. Technical requirements are well-defined through the AI-extracted list, making it easy for potential bidders to understand the scope of work.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the absence of content for the tender documents is a significant gap, preventing a full assessment of completeness. The lack of specified evaluation criteria also detracts from completeness.

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not explicitly detailed for evaluation, are described in the technical requirements, which are objective. The process is below threshold, suggesting a less formal but still competitive approach. No specific company tailoring is evident.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the availability of document URLs limits practicality. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, which could be a minor inconvenience.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no noted disputes or suspensions. The contract start date is after the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects beyond engaging minority participants, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.