Skip to main content
Tenders

Structural and visual assessments of City of York Councils Street Lighting Assets in accordance with GN22

Open
Deadline
19 days left
April 16, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022480-2026
Value
£168,000
Location
North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 09, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 16, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£168,000
Duration
24 months
Location
North Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The City of York Council has an opportunity for Structural and visual assessments of City of York Councils Street Lighting Assets in accordance with GN22

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for street lighting asset assessments offers a clear scope and reasonable financial details. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a specified CPV code and a clear procedure type. The deadline appears reasonable for a below-threshold open competition. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is clear, and the subject matter is well-defined. Mandatory requirements are listed, but the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity on how submissions will be judged.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration is provided. However, the lack of accessible document content and missing evaluation criteria means key details for a complete understanding are absent.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and criteria, although not specified, are implied to be objective. The procedure is below threshold, which typically offers good accessibility.

Practicality65/100

While the contract start date and duration are provided, the absence of e-submission details and information on financing limits the practicality. Access to document content is also a significant hurdle.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common sustainability considerations in modern tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Specific CPV code and NUTS code
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible document content
No explicit mention of sustainability criteria
Lack of e-submission details

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria for submissions.
2. Provide access to the content of tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects where relevant.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline