Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of the palace park area with electrical and low-current installations, construction of a fence, and small architecture.

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00167696/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Lubelskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
9 months
Location
Lubelskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of the palace park area with electrical and low-current installations, construction of a fence, and small architecture.
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88f6-9d71-eb9f-056e-e50001aaa002.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for construction works related to the revitalization of a palace park, including electrical and low-current installations, fencing, and street furniture.

Decyzja_pozwolenie_na_budowe_79_2025.pdfPDF
Decyzja_pozwolenie_na_budowe_79_2025.pdf -- 760.0 KB

No content extracted

Decyzja_zezwolenie_wycinka_drzew.pdfPDF
Decyzja_zezwolenie_wycinka_drzew.pdf -- 1.5 MB

No content extracted

LWKZ_dec._pozwolenie.pdfPDF
LWKZ_dec._pozwolenie.pdf -- 1.0 MB

No content extracted

PARK BRANICA RADZYπSKA PRD v2.pdfPDF
PARK BRANICA RADZYπSKA PRD v2.pdf -- 116.0 KB

No content extracted

Przedmiar_v2.pdfPDF
Przedmiar_v2.pdf -- 217.6 KB

No content extracted

STWIOR_arch.pdfPDF
STWIOR_arch.pdf -- 735.6 KB

No content extracted

STWIOR_elek.pdfPDF
STWIOR_elek.pdf -- 444.1 KB

No content extracted

SZACUNKOWA TABELA PRAC I MATERIA¥αW - Branica.pdfPDF
SZACUNKOWA TABELA PRAC I MATERIA¥αW - Branica... -- 133.8 KB

No content extracted

I-ZK.271.02.2026_Zal_nr_5_do_SWZ_wzor_umowy_roboty_budowlane.pdfPDF
I-ZK.271.02.2026_Zal_nr_5_do_SWZ_wzor_umowy_r...

This document contains the draft contract for the development of a palace park area, including electrical and low-current installations, fencing, and street furniture.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for park revitalization is generally well-structured with a good number of supporting documents, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and detailed financial information, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and is marked as EU funded. The procedure is not specified, which is a minor omission. No disputes are reported. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, but the lack of a reveal date is a concern.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, outlining the scope of works. A significant number of documents are provided, offering detailed technical specifications and contract drafts. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their offers will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and contract duration. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While numerous documents are attached, the lack of explicit requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities within the main tender notice means bidders must infer these from the attached documents.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing explicit requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The full document access is good, with 28 documents provided. The lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent, but there are no overt signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a direct document URL for submission and the lack of disclosed estimated value hinder practical assessment for potential bidders. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (implied by lack of URL)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV code, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, suggesting a standard approach rather than a focus on these areas.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Comprehensive documentation provided
Clear project description and scope
EU funded and e-procurement enabled
Active status with no reported disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing explicit submission requirements in main notice
No explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Provide a direct URL for e-submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline