Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login23 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.
LoginThis tender for CCTV Maintenance Services is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on e-submission, impacting practicality.
The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clear, but the absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.
The description of services is comprehensive and detailed, covering various aspects of CCTV maintenance. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are clearly derived from the service description. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.
Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, which is a significant gap.
The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and criteria are objective based on service provision. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of explicit mention of e-procurement.
The submission deadline is provided, but the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of accessible document URLs hinder practical application. The contract start date and duration are clear, and financing information is implied by the estimated value.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. The contract duration and start date are consistent. No suspensions or disputes are indicated, contributing to high data consistency.
There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This suggests a moderate approach to sustainability considerations.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required