Skip to main content
Tenders

Sheen Mount Primary School ~ Cleaning Tender

Open
Deadline
76 days left
June 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026113-2026
Value
£189,759
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

June 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

June 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£189,759
Duration
36 months
Location
London
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Sheen Mount Primary School is seeking to appoint a Contractor for the provision of cleaning services for its 603 students and 71 staff. The contract will be for three years, from September 2026 to 2029, operating as a Fixed Price Contract. The scope includes daily cleaning (Monday-Friday) and additional deep cleaning during holidays for a total area of 3,041 sq.m. While value for money is a key objective, the Governing body is not obliged to accept the lowest price. The school expects the contractor to demonstrate how they will support its values and principles. The contract will be on a 3-year fixed price basis.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (4)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-06-12T00:00:00.
--Bids should evidence how the contractor will support and complement the school's values.
--Further information is available in the PSQ Document.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Must be able to provide school cleaning services.
--Must be able to support and complement the school's values and principles.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Ability to provide daily cleaning (Monday to Friday).
--Ability to provide additional deep cleaning during holiday periods.
--Initiative and innovation in service provision are welcomed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS4
--Must offer a guaranteed fixed cost per annum for the provision of cleaning services.
--The contract will operate as a Fixed Price Contract.
--The value of the current contract (April 2025 to April 2026) is £63,253 +VAT.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for school cleaning services is generally well-structured, offering clear descriptions and financial information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on green procurement, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no listed disputes. Deadlines seem reasonable within the context of an open procedure. The 'Competitive flexible procedure' code is missing, which is a minor oversight.

Missing 'Competitive flexible procedure' code.
Clarity80/100

The description of services, school context, and contract terms (fixed price, duration) is clear. Requirements for initiative and innovation are mentioned but could be more precisely defined. The PSQ document is referenced for further details, implying more comprehensive information is available elsewhere.

Evaluation criteria are not specified, making it unclear how bids will be assessed beyond general principles.
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and start date is present. The current contract value is disclosed, which is helpful. However, the content of the attached 'PSQ Document' is not available, and the full tender documentation is not detailed.

Content of attached documents (PSQ Document) is not accessible within the provided tender details.
Full scope of submission requirements beyond referencing the PSQ document is limited.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed. The criteria mention that the Governing body is not obliged to accept the lowest price, promoting a value-based selection. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies, enhancing fairness. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments.

Absence of clearly defined evaluation criteria may lead to less objective assessment of bids.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies contract duration and start date. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value. The crucial point is the lack of information regarding e-submission, and the availability of documents is unclear as no content is provided. The reference to an attached plan suggests some documents are present but not accessible.

No explicit mention of an e-submission process.
Availability and content of key documents (e.g., PSQ Document, school plan) are not detailed or accessible.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration are populated consistently. Dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The estimated value and current contract value provide a clear financial context.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation incentives, which are becoming increasingly important in public tenders. While 'initiative and innovation will be welcomed,' it is not a formally assessed criterion or requirement.

No specific requirements or criteria for green procurement or social aspects.
Innovation is encouraged but not formally integrated as a selection criterion.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization details.
Well-defined service description and contract parameters (fixed price, duration).
Disclosure of estimated value and current contract value.
Open procedure and generally fair selection principles mentioned.

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria.
Inaccessibility or lack of detail regarding tender documents (PSQ, school plan).
Absence of explicit sustainability or green procurement requirements.
Unclear e-submission process.

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for assessing bids.
2. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible and provide detailed summaries.
3. Incorporate specific requirements or preferences for sustainability and innovation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline