Skip to main content
Tenders

020208 - Longford Park - People, Place and Nature Project – Evaluation Services

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 03, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
022879-2026
Value
£30,000
Location
Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 27, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 03, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£30,000
Duration
20 months
Location
Greater Manchester
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Trafford Council seeks a skilled evaluation consultant/team to evaluate the £6m People, Place and Nature Project at Longford Park, supported by over £3m from The National Lottery Heritage Fund

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-03T00:00:00.
--Requirements are to be provided in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a skilled evaluation consultant/team.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Proven ability to evaluate projects of similar scope and complexity.
--Experience with projects supported by heritage funds is likely beneficial.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The value of the contract is 30,000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender seeks evaluation services for a heritage project with a moderate value. While generally well-structured, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition,' suggesting adherence to relevant local regulations. The CPV code is appropriate. No disputes are reported. Deadlines, while active, are not flagged as unreasonable without further context.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service required is reasonably clear, identifying the project and the need for an evaluation consultant. Key requirements such as eligibility and technical capability are listed. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria significantly impacts clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the lack of available content for the tender documents is a significant omission, hindering a comprehensive understanding of the full scope and requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open competition and the estimated value is disclosed. The process appears objective with no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessment if not clarified.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a submission deadline and contract start date. Financing information is indirectly referenced through the project's overall funding. The contract duration is clear. However, the absence of e-submission details and clear document URLs reduces practicality.

No e-submission mentioned
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (submission deadline, contract start) are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender description or requirements. It is not indicated as EU funded, limiting potential for sustainability integration.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objective
Appropriate CPV code
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Upload the full content of the tender documents for bidders to review.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline