Skip to main content
Tenders

Request for Information (RFI): Climate Risk Analysis Scenario Modelling & Physical Risk Assessment

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
023815-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 30, 2026

Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
1 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The National Wealth Fund is seeking market insight on climate risk analysis, including scenario modelling and asset-level physical risk assessment, to inform future procurement and enhance portfolio-level decision making.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This RFI is in the planning stage, seeking market information on climate risk analysis. While generally well-structured, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial aspects, impacting its completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in a planning phase, so formal legal compliance aspects like clear procedures and regulatory adherence are not fully applicable yet. The CPV code is appropriate. Deadlines are not yet critical as it's an RFI. No disputes are noted.

Clarity80/100

The description of the RFI's purpose is clear, outlining the need for market insight on climate risk analysis. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for responses makes it difficult for potential respondents to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and description is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed and classified, and the content of the tender documents is not available, reducing overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

As an RFI, the focus is on gathering information, which generally promotes fairness. All basic information is accessible. The criteria for submission are not yet defined, but the absence of specific company tailoring is positive. The lack of disclosed value is a minor concern for potential respondents.

Value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The RFI is in planning, and e-submission is not explicitly mentioned, which is a drawback. The contract duration is very short (1 month), which might be unusual for an RFI response period or subsequent analysis. Financing information is not provided.

No e-submission mentioned
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical for a planning stage RFI.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the RFI's description or characteristics. This indicates a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear RFI title and objective
Well-defined CPV code
Organization and reference number specified
Basic requirements listed

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
No e-submission mentioned

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria for RFI responses.
2. Disclose the estimated value or provide a range.
3. Clarify the e-submission process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline