Skip to main content
Tenders

BAS - Gateaway agent for Montevideo in Uruguay

Open
Deadline
27 days left
April 23, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026684-2026
Value
£400,000
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 16, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 23, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Budget
£400,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Gloucestershire, Wiltshire and Bristol/Bath area
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

UKRI is seeking to appoint a Gateway agency supplier to provide services for the British Antarctic Survey in Montevideo, Uruguay.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a gateway agent in Montevideo is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a typical range for open procedures. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of services is concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of accessible document content with summaries significantly reduce clarity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and start date. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents is a significant omission, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully specified, are not overtly tailored to specific companies. The lack of e-submission is a minor detractor from full fairness.

No e-submission
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of e-submission and the lack of readily available document content with summaries reduce the practicality for bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Estimated value and duration disclosed
Open procedure for broad participation

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents fully accessible with content summaries for better completeness and practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline