Skip to main content
Tenders

Selective renovation works in the building of Riga Secondary School No. 31 at Skuju Street 11, Riga

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
166746
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Selective renovation works in the building of Riga Secondary School No. 31 at Skuju Street 11, Riga

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Refer to 'Main tender page' for submission deadline: April 9, 2026, 10:00]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for other stipulations]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for submission requirements]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for exclusion conditions]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for selection criteria]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Refer to 'Tehniskā specifikācija' for technical specification outlining requirements for preparation, execution, materials, and waste management]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for technical proposal requirements]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--[Refer to 'Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiem' for a form to declare financial turnover in the construction sector over the past three years]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for financial proposal requirements]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiemDOC
10.pielikums_Finanšu izziņa__1.doc -- 51.0 KB

This document contains a form for bidders to declare their financial turnover in the construction sector over the past three years, as part of an open tender for renovation works.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166746_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323145728.pdf -- 100.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical proposal requirements, financial proposal requirements, and other stipulations.

Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
Pielikums_Nr.1._tehniskā_specifikācija_Skuju_... -- 45.0 KB

This document contains the technical specification for selective renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31, outlining requirements for preparation, execution, materials, and waste management.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31, identified as RDĪD 2026/18, with a submission deadline of April 9, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31 is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the active status. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached files. The conditions for participation are outlined, though specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and tender validity. Four relevant documents are attached, covering technical specifications, tender requirements, and financial declarations. The estimated value is not disclosed.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and e-procurement is utilized. While document access is generally provided, the 'Issues' section flags 'Restricted document access', which could be a concern. Objective criteria are implied but not explicitly detailed.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The contract duration is specified.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of works
Well-defined set of required documents
Active e-procurement system
Reasonable timeline for submission

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline