Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Selective renovation works in the building of Riga Secondary School No. 31 at Skuju Street 11, Riga

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
166746
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 23, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Tender Opening

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Selective renovation works in the building of Riga Secondary School No. 31 at Skuju Street 11, Riga

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for selective renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31 presents a moderate competition opportunity. A winning strategy will focus on demonstrating robust technical capability, strong financial stability, and meticulous adherence to all specified requirements, particularly in preparation, execution, materials, and waste management. Given the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, a proactive approach to exceeding minimum standards and highlighting past performance will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Experienced Partner for Educational Facility Renovations

Commitment to Quality and Efficient Project Delivery

Meticulous Adherence to Technical and Regulatory Standards

Key Opportunities
Lack of explicit evaluation criteria allows for a focus on demonstrating overall excellence and exceeding minimum requirements.
The short duration (3 months) favors bidders with efficient project management and readily available resources.
The CPV code (45000000 - Construction work for buildings) is broad, allowing for a wide range of qualified construction firms to bid.
Key Challenges
Absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to tailor the bid to specific scoring mechanisms.

Focus on comprehensively addressing all stated requirements to the highest possible standard. Emphasize past performance and client testimonials that demonstrate quality and reliability. Assume a holistic evaluation where all aspects of the bid contribute to the overall impression.

Potential for high competition due to the nature of public works and the broad CPV code.

Thoroughly research potential competitors. Differentiate through a clear and concise proposal that highlights unique strengths, such as specialized expertise or innovative (though not explicitly required) approaches to execution or waste management that offer tangible benefits.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An experienced construction company with a proven track record in public sector building renovations, specifically in educational institutions. The ideal bidder will possess strong project management skills, a skilled workforce, a deep understanding of Latvian construction regulations, and a commitment to quality and timely delivery. They should also have a solid financial standing and a history of successful completion of similar-sized projects.
Key Requirements
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Meeting Eligibility and Selection Criteria
Detailed Technical Proposal (Preparation, Execution, Materials, Waste Management)
Demonstrated Financial Turnover in Construction Sector (Past 3 Years)
Adherence to Submission Deadline (April 9, 2026, 10:00)
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated experience in school renovations, highlighting minimal disruption to ongoing educational activities.
A highly detailed and practical technical proposal that goes beyond the minimum requirements, showcasing proactive problem-solving and efficiency.
A clear and concise presentation of financial stability and capacity to undertake the project within the specified timeframe.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities for young people in the construction sector, framing it as a contribution to the community surrounding the school.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Capability (Preparation, Execution, Materials, Waste Management)

Provide a highly detailed and practical technical proposal. Clearly outline methodologies for each stage, specify high-quality materials that meet or exceed standards, and present a robust waste management plan that emphasizes efficiency and environmental responsibility (even if not a formal requirement). Use diagrams and timelines where appropriate.

Financial Stability

Ensure the declared financial turnover is robust and clearly demonstrates the capacity to undertake this project. Provide any supporting documentation that reinforces financial health and reliability.

Compliance and Risk Management

Meticulously review and address all mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility criteria. Proactively identify potential risks in the project execution (e.g., material sourcing, site access) and present clear mitigation strategies within the technical proposal.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Review Exclusion and Eligibility Criteria
CriticalHigh effort

Scrutinize 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for all mandatory exclusion grounds and selection criteria. Ensure absolute compliance to avoid immediate disqualification.

Avoids disqualification and ensures a level playing field.
Develop a Comprehensive Technical Proposal
CriticalHigh effort

Go beyond the minimum requirements in the 'Tehniskā specifikācija'. Detail preparation, execution, material selection (justifying quality and durability), and a proactive waste management plan. Consider visual aids.

Demonstrates superior capability and attention to detail, crucial in the absence of explicit scoring.
Highlight Past Performance in Similar Projects
HighMed effort

Include case studies or references from previous school renovation projects, emphasizing successful completion, adherence to budget and schedule, and minimal disruption.

Builds trust and credibility, showcasing relevant experience.
Confirm Financial Capacity
HighMed effort

Ensure the financial turnover declaration in 'Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiem' is accurate and robust, clearly demonstrating the ability to undertake the project.

Meets a fundamental requirement and assures the contracting authority of financial stability.
Proactive Risk Identification and Mitigation
MediumMed effort

Within the technical proposal, identify potential project risks (e.g., material availability, site logistics) and outline clear, actionable mitigation strategies.

Demonstrates foresight and preparedness, reducing perceived risk for the contracting authority.
Consider Community Engagement
LowLow effort

Although not a requirement, consider a brief statement on potential community benefits, such as local employment or skill development, to add value.

May subtly enhance the bidder's image as a responsible corporate citizen.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most reliable and experienced contractor for educational facility renovations, emphasizing a deep understanding of the unique needs and constraints of school environments.
Differentiate by showcasing a proactive and detailed approach to project execution and quality control, even in areas not explicitly weighted in the evaluation.
Highlight a strong financial standing and a proven ability to deliver projects on time and within budget, reinforcing trustworthiness.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Refer to 'Main tender page' for submission deadline: April 9, 2026, 10:00]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for other stipulations]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for submission requirements]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for exclusion conditions]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for selection criteria]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--[Refer to 'Tehniskā specifikācija' for technical specification outlining requirements for preparation, execution, materials, and waste management]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for technical proposal requirements]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--[Refer to 'Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiem' for a form to declare financial turnover in the construction sector over the past three years]
--[Refer to 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' for financial proposal requirements]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiemDOC
10.pielikums_Finanšu izziņa__1.doc -- 51.0 KB

This document contains a form for bidders to declare their financial turnover in the construction sector over the past three years, as part of an open tender for renovation works.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166746_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260323145728.pdf -- 100.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical proposal requirements, financial proposal requirements, and other stipulations.

Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
Pielikums_Nr.1._tehniskā_specifikācija_Skuju_... -- 45.0 KB

This document contains the technical specification for selective renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31, outlining requirements for preparation, execution, materials, and waste management.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31, identified as RDĪD 2026/18, with a submission deadline of April 9, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 31 is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the active status. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented across several attached files. The conditions for participation are outlined, though specific evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and tender validity. Four relevant documents are attached, covering technical specifications, tender requirements, and financial declarations. The estimated value is not disclosed.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and e-procurement is utilized. While document access is generally provided, the 'Issues' section flags 'Restricted document access', which could be a concern. Objective criteria are implied but not explicitly detailed.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

E-submission is indicated. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent. The contract duration is specified.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of works
Well-defined set of required documents
Active e-procurement system
Reasonable timeline for submission

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline