Skip to main content
Tenders

Trowbridge Town Council Legionella Testing and Monitoring.

Open
Deadline
35 days left
May 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026265-2026
Value
£54,000
Location
South West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£54,000
Duration
36 months
Location
South West England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Trowbridge Town Council invites tenders from competent and qualified contractors for the provision of Legionella monitoring and testing across seven key council sites for an initial period of 3 years with the possibility to extend for a further 2 years. The Council is committed to ensuring the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors by maintaining full compliance with ACOP L8 and HSG 274.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (10)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (4)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--Submit a Financial Cost Statement: Detailed breakdown of annual monitoring.
--Submit a Technical Proposal: Methodology for testing and electronic logbook management.
--Submit Experience: Evidence of similar contracts with local authorities or public sector clients.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly stated in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be competent and qualified contractors.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Provide a schedule of temperature and legionella testing based on attached risk assessments and asset lists.
--All work must be carried out in accordance with British Standard BS7592.
--Comply with ACOP L8 and HSG 274.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Detailed breakdown of annual monitoring costs.
--Tender value: 54000 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Legionella testing and monitoring is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a defined evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit mention of e-submission and sustainability criteria, and the availability of tender documents is not confirmed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear procedure and appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of site visits and document review. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of services, scope of works, and submission requirements are clearly articulated. Specific standards (BS7592, ACOP L8, HSG 274) are referenced, and site visits are offered for clarification. However, the evaluation criteria are presented as a weighting matrix without detailed scoring guidelines.

Evaluation criteria weighting provided, but detailed scoring guidelines are missing.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the content of essential documents like risk assessments and asset lists (Appendix A) is not directly accessible or summarized, and the number of available tender documents is listed as 0.

Content of Appendix A (risk assessments and asset lists) not directly accessible.
Number of tender documents with content/summaries is 0.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open competition, and the evaluation criteria are disclosed with weightings. Site visits are offered, and contact points for queries are provided, promoting transparency. There are no obvious requirements tailored to specific companies. The value is disclosed, and an e-procurement system is implied by the submission requirements, though not explicitly stated.

Practicality65/100

The contract duration and start date are specified. Financing information is not detailed. The primary concern is the lack of explicit mention of an e-submission portal, which could impact the practicality for some bidders. The site visit dates are provided, which aids in practical planning.

No explicit mention of e-submission portal.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start date is after the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the tender documentation. This category is therefore rated low.

No explicit sustainability criteria (green procurement, social aspects, innovation).

Strengths

Clear scope of works and technical requirements.
Transparent evaluation weighting.
Provision of site visits for clarification.

Concerns

Lack of accessible tender document content (Appendix A).
Absence of explicit e-submission details.
No sustainability considerations mentioned.

Recommendations

1. Provide direct access or detailed summaries of Appendix A documents.
2. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline