Delivery of meat, cold cuts, and poultry

This tender for meat, cold cuts, and poultry is generally well-structured with clear documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure type. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks. The deadline is relatively short, which might be a concern for some bidders.

The tender provides a clear title, description, and lists mandatory requirements such as exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities. The attached documents, including the SWZ and price form, offer specific details on procurement conditions and product requirements.

Essential information like the organization, title, reference number, and contract duration are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are attached, the lack of financial details impacts overall completeness.

The tender is characterized by e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The requirements are generally objective, and the documents are accessible. The lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria could be perceived as a minor fairness concern, but no company-specific tailoring is evident.

The tender is set up for e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of financing information and a clear contract start date makes it less practical for bidders to fully assess their capacity and planning. The short submission deadline also affects practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The data presented is consistent and reliable.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.