Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction supervision for the creation of engineering infrastructure in the Cepļu street area in Jelgava

Open
Deadline
26 days left
April 22, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168416
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 22, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 15, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 22, 2026

Tender Opening

April 22, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Zemgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction supervision for the creation of engineering infrastructure in the Cepļu street area in Jelgava
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Not specified
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168416_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322142036.pdf -- 96.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements, including qualification criteria, technical and financial proposal submissions, and evaluation methods for construction supervision services in Jelgava.

7.pielikums “Līguma projekts CP”DOC
7_piel_Liguma_projekts_BU_CP.docx -- 57.2 KB

This document contains the draft contract for construction supervision services for the engineering infrastructure development in the Cepļu Street area of Jelgava.

8.pielikums “Līguma projekts UKT”DOC
8_piel_Liguma projekts_BU_UKT_JU.docx -- 62.1 KB

This document contains the draft contract for construction supervision of the water supply and sewage system development in the Cepļu Street area of Jelgava.

NolikumsPDF
Nolikums_29_AK.pdf -- 298.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for construction supervision services for the creation of engineering infrastructure in the Cepļu Street area of Jelgava.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for construction supervision services for engineering infrastructure development in the Cepļu Street area of Jelgava.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding the undisclosed estimated value, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria, and potentially restricted document access.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and includes a proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is presumed due to the nature of public procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and key requirements are outlined in the provided documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. The duration of the contract is specified implicitly through the completion date. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness.

Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting broad participation. E-procurement is indicated. While most documents seem accessible, a potential issue of 'Restricted document access' is flagged, which could impact fairness if not resolved. No specific company tailoring is apparent.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive. However, specific details on e-submission mechanism beyond 'Elektronisko iepirkumu sistēma' are not explicitly detailed. Contract start date and financing details beyond 'EU Funded' are missing.

No e-submission detail beyond platform
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. Dates appear logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender is active with a defined valid period.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is EU funded, which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements within the provided information.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Open procedure
Clear description of services
EU Funded
E-Procurement

Concerns

Value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access and ensure full availability for all potential bidders.
2. Explicitly state evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
3. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline