Skip to main content
Tenders

Selective landscaping works (path renovation) of territories used by preschool educational institutions of Riga City Municipality

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
167630
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Tender Opening

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Selective landscaping works (path renovation) of territories used by preschool educational institutions of Riga City Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific submission requirements detailed in the provided text.]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed in the provided text.]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific eligibility requirements detailed in the provided text.]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements detailed in the provided text.]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements detailed in the provided text.]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167630_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260311135622.pdf -- 100.9 KB

This document outlines the requirements for the first part of a tender concerning the selective landscaping (path restoration) of areas used by Riga city municipality's preschool educational institutions.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167630_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260311135623.pdf -- 100.9 KB

This document outlines the specific requirements and documentation needed for the second part of a tender concerning the improvement and restoration of paths in preschool territories managed by the Riga City Municipality.

Nolikuma 1. pielikums - Tehniskā specifikācijaDOC
2026 pii celiņi TEHSPEC.docx -- 56.8 KB

This document contains the technical specification for the selective landscaping works (path restoration) in the territories of Riga City Municipality's preschool educational institutions.

Atklāta konkursa nolikumsDOC
Līguma_projekts_2026_PII_labiekārtošana_celiņ... -- 229.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the improvement works (sidewalk restoration) for pre-school educational institutions in Riga, including technical specifications and contractor obligations.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the selective improvement works (sidewalk renovation) of the territories used by Riga city municipality's preschool educational institutions, with a submission deadline of March 27, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for path restoration in Riga's preschools is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria and potential document access restrictions are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear open competition format and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable. No disputes are reported. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the structure.

Clarity80/100

The description of works is clear, and multiple documents outline technical specifications and requirements. The criteria for evaluation are not explicitly stated, which slightly impacts clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, contract duration, and value (though estimated value is not disclosed). Five relevant documents are attached, covering technical specifications and regulations.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open to all bidders and uses e-procurement. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag raises concerns about full document accessibility for all potential bidders, impacting fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is e-procurement enabled, and a contract start date is implied by the duration. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of a direct URL for e-submission (though implied by e-procurement) slightly reduce practicality.

No e-submission (direct URL not provided)
Financing info not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Well-defined scope of works
Multiple technical specification documents provided
Open competition procedure
E-procurement enabled

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Potential restricted document access
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly state the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
3. Confirm and ensure full public access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline