Skip to main content
Tenders

Supply of climate chambers and plant cultivation rack systems for LBTU needs

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168809
Value
€21,000
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 22, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Tender Opening

April 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€21,000
Duration
2 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€51,295
Avg. Bids
2.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
2,840 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Climate chambers and plant cultivation rack systems
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is open.
--Bidders must adhere to the regulations outlined in the 'Nolikums ar pielikumu' document.
--Specific requirements for Part 1 are detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija'.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided summaries.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific eligibility requirements are detailed in the provided summaries.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Part 1: Technical requirements for climate chambers.
--Part 2: Technical requirements for a specialized plant cultivation rack system.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided summaries.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168809_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322152821.pdf -- 97.7 KB

This document contains the technical and financial requirements for the first part of a tender for climate chambers and plant growth shelf systems for the Latvian University of Life Sciences and Technologies.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168809_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260322152822.pdf -- 97.5 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the second part of a procurement, specifically for a specialized plant cultivation rack system for the Latvian University of Life Sciences and Technologies.

Nolikums ar pielikumuDOC
Nolikums_2026_31_.docx -- 107.3 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender by the Latvian University of Life Sciences and Technologies for the supply of climate chambers and plant growth rack systems.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender by the Latvian University of Life Sciences and Technologies for the supply of climate chambers and plant cultivation rack systems.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for climate chambers and plant cultivation racks is generally well-structured with essential information provided. Key concerns relate to the lack of explicit evaluation criteria and the potential restriction of document access, impacting full transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is clear, though explicit mention of regulatory compliance beyond standard procurement rules is absent.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required goods is clear, and technical specifications are referenced. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and duration are present. Multiple required documents are linked, including technical specifications. However, the lack of detail on eligibility and financial requirements within the summarized information warrants caution.

No specific eligibility requirements are detailed
No specific financial requirements are detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and uses e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is disclosed. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests a potential limitation on full document access for all interested parties, which could impact fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

While the tender is active and has a clear contract start date implied by the duration, the absence of explicit e-submission instructions and a clear URL for the main tender document detract from practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

No e-submission (assumed from general lack of detail, though e-procurement is mentioned)
Document URL not explicitly provided for main document
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no stated disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears logical, with reveal and opening dates preceding the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided description.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Estimated value disclosed
CPV code provided
Reasonable deadline

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of detail on eligibility and financial requirements
Absence of explicit sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria for bidders.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline