Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Lift Modernisation Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020805-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 17, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£60,000
Duration
19 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Lift Modernisation Multi-Disciplinary Consultancy - for the two multi-storey car parks in Camberley.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for lift modernization consultancy is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a specified procedure. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The 'Below threshold - open competition' procedure suggests adherence to relevant regulations for its value.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, specifying the service and location. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are listed, indicating a structured approach. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, and contract duration/start. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries severely hinders completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is not overly restrictive. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly stated as mandatory.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the lack of explicit e-submission is a drawback. The availability of documents is questionable due to the lack of content.

No e-submission
Document URL missing (implied by lack of content)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Specified estimated value and contract duration
Open competition procedure
CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible tender document content
Lack of explicit e-submission
Limited sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide clear evaluation criteria.
2. Upload complete tender documents with accessible content.
3. Clarify e-submission process and requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline