Skip to main content
Tenders

National Framework Agreement for the provision of an enteral feeding accessories delivery service

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027711-2026
Value
£19,200,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£19,200,000
Duration
24 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The aim of the proposed framework is to provide products to support the use of enteral feed systems. Traditionally, organisations have obtained the accessories alongside the main enteral feed items. This framework will provide an alternative procurement route for organisations looking to source enteral feed accessories separately to the main feed items.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The framework is for the provision of enteral feeding accessory products.
--Products must support the use of enteral feed systems.
--Service to patients in both clinical and community settings.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for enteral feeding accessories offers a clear scope and reasonable financial parameters but lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible documentation, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and specifies a clear CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant aspect of legal compliance in procurement.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the framework's aim and scope is clear, outlining the provision of enteral feeding accessories for clinical and community settings. However, the absence of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements leaves significant ambiguity for potential bidders.

No specific eligibility requirements listed
No specific technical capability requirements listed
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the crucial aspect of tender documents is incomplete, with no content or summaries available, and no specific requirements detailed, significantly hindering completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and deadlines are provided. The criteria for selection are not specified, which could lead to perceived unfairness. The lack of specific requirements also means the criteria are not objectively defined.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. The absence of information regarding e-submission and document URLs makes the practical execution of the submission process unclear and potentially less efficient.

No e-submission specified
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are consistent and do not present any apparent contradictions.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common considerations in modern public procurement. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of scope and aim
Reasonable estimated value and contract duration
Open procedure for broad participation
All basic information present

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
No e-submission specified

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide full access to tender documents with detailed requirements.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and provide necessary links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline