Skip to main content
Tenders

Pump Track

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 06, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027460-2026
Value
£200,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 30, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 06, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£200,000
Duration
5 months
Location
North East England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Project Aim: To design and construct a durable, community-focused pump track suitable for a wide range of users and abilities. Scope of Works: Full design and installation, including site assessment, concept and detailed design, ground preparation, drainage, surfacing, supply of materials, project management, health and safety compliance, construction, quality assurance, site reinstatement, and handover documentation. Contractors must ensure designs reflect best practice in pump track construction, durability, safety, accessibility, and long-term maintenance efficiency. Recommended Design: Contractors are encouraged to include a recommended design. Design Submission Content: Concept visuals, layouts, drawings, description of features, intended user groups, accessibility, materials, drainage, safety, and maintenance requirements. Pricing Requirements: Full cost breakdown, optional extras, design fees, estimated maintenance costs, and price validity.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (12)
Financial (5)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Submit a recommended design proposal.
--Design proposals must include specific content as detailed in the technical capability requirements.
--Pricing must be submitted as detailed in the financial requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds mentioned in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Contractors must be capable of undertaking the full design and installation of a pump track.
--Contractors must ensure designs reflect best practice in pump track construction, durability, safety, accessibility, and long-term maintenance efficiency.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--Site assessment and feasibility considerations.
--Concept design and detailed technical design.
--Ground preparation, earthworks, drainage, and surfacing.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS5
--Full cost breakdown for design and installation for each price point.
--Identification of optional extras and exclusions.
--Design fees clearly separated where applicable.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a pump track is generally well-structured with clear scope and requirements, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document access, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' and specified evaluation criteria could pose a risk to procedural fairness and legal defensibility. The deadline, while active, is relatively short given the scope.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the project aim and scope of works is comprehensive and detailed, outlining specific deliverables and expected outcomes. Requirements for design proposals and pricing are also clearly articulated.

Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and contract start date. However, the lack of accessible tender documents (0 documents with content/summaries) is a significant omission, preventing a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by being an open competition and clearly disclosing the estimated value. The requirements are generally objective and focused on technical capability and design quality. The encouragement for a 'recommended design' allows for contractor innovation. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to assess how proposals will be judged objectively.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration, and includes financing information implicitly through the estimated value. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and a direct URL for documents hinders practical access and submission for potential bidders.

No e-submission mentioned
No document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data integrity within the provided information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are increasingly important considerations in modern public procurement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear and detailed scope of works
Comprehensive design submission requirements
Open competition procedure
Estimated value disclosed

Concerns

Lack of accessible tender documents
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline relative to scope
No mention of sustainability or social aspects

Recommendations

1. Provide direct links or access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria and their weighting.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline