Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Construction of a civil defense and civil protection warehouse

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 09, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00170977/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie, Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 02, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 09, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of a civil defense and civil protection warehouse

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender for a civil defense and civil protection warehouse requires a strong focus on meticulous planning, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to the Employer's aesthetic preferences. While lacking explicit evaluation criteria, a winning bid will likely prioritize a technically sound, compliant, and competitively priced proposal, with a proactive approach to design approvals.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable and Compliant Construction Partner for Critical Infrastructure

Cost-Effective Solution with Proactive Design Management

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to define perceived value through a well-structured and comprehensive bid.
The requirement for Employer acceptance of facade colors and joinery allows for early engagement and relationship building, potentially influencing the final decision.
The lump-sum nature of the contract, encompassing all preparatory and waste management, allows for a competitive edge through efficient planning and cost control.
The absence of explicit Green or Social procurement requirements means a bidder can focus on core construction excellence and cost without the added complexity of meeting specific sustainability targets, potentially simplifying the bid process.
Key Challenges
The absence of disclosed estimated value and detailed tender documents (Projekt Iêowo-Osada Magazyn.pdf, Magazyn OL i OC Iêowo-Osada Przedmiar.pdf, Magazyn OL i OC Iêowo-Osada Kosztorys ofertowy.pdf) makes accurate cost estimation and scope definition difficult.

Conduct thorough site visits, engage with the Contracting Authority for clarification on any ambiguities in the project scope, and utilize industry benchmarks for similar construction projects to develop a robust cost model. Assume a conservative approach to risk in pricing.

The requirement for Employer acceptance of aesthetic choices (facade colors, joinery) introduces a potential for delays or scope creep if not managed proactively.

Develop a clear communication and approval process with the Employer from the outset. Present well-researched and appealing options for facade colors and joinery, perhaps offering a few pre-approved palettes that align with typical public building aesthetics, to streamline the decision-making process.

The lack of specified technical and financial requirements means bidders must infer what the authority deems acceptable, potentially leading to a wide range of bid quality.

Leverage past successful bids for similar public projects. Ensure the bid clearly demonstrates robust technical capability and financial stability, even if not explicitly requested, to build confidence. Focus on meeting all stated eligibility requirements comprehensively.

Ideal Bidder Profile
A construction company with proven experience in public sector projects, particularly in building infrastructure. They should possess strong project management capabilities, a robust supply chain for materials, and a clear understanding of Polish construction regulations. Experience with local authorities and a demonstrated ability to manage client expectations regarding design details would be advantageous.
Key Requirements
Construction of a civil defense and civil protection warehouse building.
Execution of necessary technical infrastructure.
Execution of electrical installation with energy connection.
Execution of paved areas with concrete blocks.
Execution of access paths and driveways to the facility.
Site development as necessary for the proper functioning of the facility.
Execution and installation of a commemorative and information plaque.
The choice of facade colors and window and door joinery requires the Employer's acceptance each time.
The lump-sum remuneration also includes all preparatory and cleaning works necessary for the proper execution of the task, including in particular: site clearance, removal, management, and disposal of waste generated during the works, in accordance with applicable regulations.
Key Discriminators
Demonstrated proactive communication and collaboration with the Contracting Authority regarding design approvals.
A highly detailed and transparent cost breakdown that instills confidence in the lump-sum price.
A clear and efficient project execution plan that addresses all aspects of the tender requirements, including waste management and site preparation.
A commitment to quality and durability in the construction, even without explicit sustainability requirements.
Social Value Opportunities
While not explicitly required, consider including a commitment to local employment or training opportunities during the construction phase. This can be framed as a benefit to the local community (GMINA IŁOWO-OSADA) and a demonstration of good corporate citizenship, even if not a formal evaluation criterion.
Bid Focus Areas
Price/Cost

Develop a highly competitive and well-justified lump-sum price. Ensure all costs, including preparatory works, waste management, and potential design revisions, are accurately factored in. Highlight cost-efficiency through optimized construction methods and material sourcing.

Technical Compliance

Meticulously address every eligibility requirement. Provide clear, concise, and evidence-based descriptions of how each aspect of the construction will be executed. Emphasize adherence to all relevant Polish building codes and regulations.

Client Relationship Management (Design Approval)

Proactively propose solutions for facade colors and joinery that are likely to be accepted, demonstrating an understanding of the Employer's aesthetic preferences. Outline a clear process for obtaining approvals to avoid delays.

Recommendations6
Thoroughly Analyze Project Scope & Site
CriticalHigh effort

Given the lack of detailed tender documents and estimated value, conduct an in-depth site visit and request all available supplementary information from the Contracting Authority. This is crucial for accurate cost estimation and scope definition.

Ensures a realistic and competitive bid, minimizing risks of underpricing or scope disputes.
Develop a Competitive Lump-Sum Price
CriticalHigh effort

Focus on optimizing construction processes and material procurement to offer a highly competitive lump-sum price. Ensure all indirect costs, including waste management and preparatory works, are fully accounted for.

Increases the likelihood of winning, especially in the absence of explicit evaluation criteria where price is often a dominant factor.
Proactive Design Approval Strategy
HighMed effort

Develop a clear strategy for managing the Employer's acceptance of facade colors and window/door joinery. Prepare a range of aesthetically pleasing and compliant options to present early in the process.

Minimizes potential delays and demonstrates client-centricity, potentially influencing the Employer's perception of the bidder.
Demonstrate Robust Project Management
HighMed effort

Even without explicit technical requirements, clearly outline the project management approach, including timelines, resource allocation, and quality control measures, to instill confidence in the bidder's capability.

Builds trust and assures the Contracting Authority of the bidder's ability to deliver the project successfully.
Address Waste Management Explicitly
MediumLow effort

Detail the approach to waste management, removal, and disposal, emphasizing compliance with all applicable regulations, as this is a specific inclusion in the lump-sum remuneration.

Avoids potential penalties or disputes related to environmental compliance and demonstrates thoroughness.
Consider Local Community Engagement
LowLow effort

While not a formal requirement, consider a voluntary commitment to local employment or training to enhance the bid's appeal to the local authority.

Can be a subtle differentiator and demonstrate corporate social responsibility.
Competitive Positioning
Position the bid as a low-risk, high-reliability solution. Emphasize a proven track record in public sector construction and a commitment to delivering on time and within budget, even with the inherent uncertainties of this tender. Highlight the bidder's ability to manage client expectations effectively, particularly regarding design approvals.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (9)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Construction of a civil defense and civil protection warehouse building.
--Execution of necessary technical infrastructure.
--Execution of electrical installation with energy connection.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

6 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a5f-16aa-aea0-056e-e50001aab5f7.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the construction of a civil defense and population protection warehouse by the Municipality of Iłowo-Osada, with submissions to be made electronically.

Magazyn OL i OC Iêowo-Osada Kosztorys ofertowy.pdfPDF
Magazyn OL i OC Iêowo-Osada Kosztorys ofertow... -- 98.9 KB

No content extracted

Magazyn OL i OC Iêowo-Osada Przedmiar.pdfPDF
Magazyn OL i OC Iêowo-Osada Przedmiar.pdf -- 144.8 KB

No content extracted

Projekt Iêowo-Osada Magazyn.pdfPDF
Projekt Iêowo-Osada Magazyn.pdf -- 1.3 MB

No content extracted

Zał. nr 11 Wykaz osób magazyn OC.docDOC
Zał. nr 11 Wykaz osób magazyn OC.doc

This document contains a list of personnel required for the construction of a civil defense warehouse.

Zał. nr 9 - Wzór umowy magazyn OC.pdfPDF
Zał. nr 9 - Wzór umowy magazyn OC.pdf

This document contains the draft contract for the construction of a civil defense and public safety warehouse, outlining the scope of work, contractor's responsibilities, timelines, and payment terms.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the construction of a civil defense warehouse is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a good set of supporting documents. However, it lacks transparency regarding the estimated value and evaluation criteria, and the submission deadline might be tight.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear CPV code and active status. The procedure is not specified, which is a minor point of concern. Deadlines are present but could be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are indicated.

Procedure type not specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the construction works is detailed and specific, outlining the scope of the warehouse, technical infrastructure, and site development. The requirement for client approval on facade colors is clear. The AI-extracted requirements also provide a good overview.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a deadline. A significant number of documents are attached, including a draft contract and personnel forms. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which is a significant omission. The value is not disclosed, which can hinder fair competition. No requirements appear to be tailored to specific companies.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the contract start date and financing information are missing. The duration of the contract is also not specified, impacting practical planning for bidders.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV code is appropriate for the described works.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documents or description. The tender is EU funded is not specified.

No explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)
EU funding status not specified

Strengths

Detailed technical description of works
E-procurement utilized
Comprehensive set of attached documents
Clear CPV code and location information

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Missing contract start date and duration
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Specify the contract start date and duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline