Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of entrance gates to the BM Lisie Jamy area - RDW Lubaczów

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00166024/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of entrance gates to the BM Lisie Jamy area - RDW Lubaczów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (9)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Dismantling of a double-leaf gate
--Dismantling of an entrance gate
--Installation of a sliding gate
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

12 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88b5-d023-f031-056e-e50001aa9708.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the renovation of entrance gates at the BM Lisie Jamy- RDW Lubaczów site, detailing the scope of work, qualification requirements, and evaluation criteria.

10.ROZDZIA¥ IV - Projektowane postanowienia umowy.docDOC
10.ROZDZIA¥ IV - Projektowane postanowienia u... -- 273.0 KB

No content extracted

1.SPIS TRESCI.docxDOC
1.SPIS TRESCI.docx -- 174.7 KB

No content extracted

2ROZDZIA¥ I - IDW.docDOC
2ROZDZIA¥ I - IDW.doc -- 620.5 KB

No content extracted

3ROZDZIA¥ I PODSTAWOWE INFORMACJE DOTYCZñCE POST¿POWANIA.docxDOC
3ROZDZIA¥ I PODSTAWOWE INFORMACJE DOTYCZñCE P... -- 204.8 KB

No content extracted

4.ROZDZIA¥ II - Formularz oferty.docDOC
4.ROZDZIA¥ II - Formularz oferty.doc -- 87.5 KB

No content extracted

5.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 1 do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE o wykluczeniu.docDOC
5.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 1 do oferty - Où... -- 71.0 KB

No content extracted

6.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 1A do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE o wykluczeniu.docDOC
6.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 1A do oferty - O... -- 67.0 KB

No content extracted

7.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 2 do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE o speênianiu warunków.do...DOC
7.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 2 do oferty - Où... -- 61.5 KB

No content extracted

8.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 2A do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE o speênianiu warunków.d...DOC
8.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 2A do oferty - O... -- 60.0 KB

No content extracted

9.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 3 do oferty - OùWIADCZENIE Konsorcjum.docDOC
9.ROZDZIA¥ II - ZA¥ñCZNIK Nr 3 do oferty - Où... -- 60.5 KB

No content extracted

Wymagania BHP 2020-dostosowana cyfrowo.pdfPDF
Wymagania BHP 2020-dostosowana cyfrowo.pdf -- 788.0 KB

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for gate renovation is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements, but lacks specific financial details and evaluation criteria, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a specified procedure. However, the absence of a reveal date and explicit evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is detailed and specific, with technical requirements clearly outlined. The reference to OPZ and SWZ as annexes further clarifies the scope.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial documents like eligibility and financial requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided text.

Estimated value not disclosed
Eligibility requirements not explicitly detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair with objective technical requirements. The disclosure of the contract duration and the use of e-procurement are positive. However, the lack of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria could be perceived as less transparent.

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract duration. However, the absence of a contract start date and explicit financing information limits its practicality.

No contract start date specified
No explicit financing information provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, organization, and deadline are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU-funded, suggesting a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical requirements
Use of e-procurement
Specific CPV code provided
Contract duration specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit eligibility and financial requirements in provided text
No sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submitted bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline