Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of 1st of May Street in Jastrowie

Open
Deadline
3 days left
March 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00153626/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Wielkopolskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 30, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Wielkopolskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of 1st of May Street in Jastrowie

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information in the text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information in the text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de80dd-06a8-dfed-056e-e50001ac865e.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the construction of 1-go Maja street in Jastrowie, Poland, detailing the scope of works and submission requirements.

Załącznik Nr 1_Formularz ofertowy.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 1_Formularz ofertowy.doc -- 69.5 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 2_Oświadczenie wykonawcy.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 2_Oświadczenie wykonawcy.doc -- 57.0 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 3_Zobowiązanie.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 3_Zobowiązanie.doc -- 42.0 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 4_Oświadczenie o wsp. wykonywaniu robót(1).docDOC
Załącznik Nr 4_Oświadczenie o wsp. wykonywani... -- 39.5 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 5_Oświadczenie wykonawcy o akt. inoformacji.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 5_Oświadczenie wykonawcy o akt. ... -- 38.0 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 6_Projekt umowy.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 6_Projekt umowy.doc -- 230.0 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 7_Wykaz wyk. robót.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 7_Wykaz wyk. robót.doc -- 35.0 KB

No content extracted

Załącznik Nr 8_Wykaz osób.docDOC
Załącznik Nr 8_Wykaz osób.doc -- 40.5 KB

No content extracted

SWZ 1 Maja.pdfPDF
SWZ 1 Maja.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Order Conditions (SWZ) for the public procurement procedure concerning the construction of 1-go Maja street in Jastrowie.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road construction in Jastrowie is generally well-structured but lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial information. The e-procurement characteristic is a positive aspect.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and active status. However, the lack of disclosed value and potential short submission deadline raise concerns regarding procedural fairness and regulatory adherence. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance gap.

Missing evaluation criteria
Value not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The description of the road construction project is clear and provides context about the existing road conditions and the planned improvements. The availability of a Specification of the Order Conditions (SWZ) document indicates a structured approach to defining requirements.

Completeness70/100

While essential information like title, reference, organization, and deadline are present, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of explicit details on contract duration and financing. Several attached documents lack content summaries, hindering a full understanding of requirements.

Value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The use of e-procurement and the disclosure of basic tender information contribute to fairness. However, the absence of disclosed value and the lack of specified, objective evaluation criteria could potentially lead to subjective decision-making, impacting overall fairness.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a practical aspect. However, critical practical information such as the contract start date and explicit financing details are missing, making it challenging for potential bidders to fully assess the project's feasibility and their capacity to undertake it.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing info
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, deadline, and CPV code are populated. The tender is active and shows no signs of suspension or disputes, indicating good data consistency in the provided metadata.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria, which are becoming increasingly important in public procurement.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

E-Procurement utilized
Clear project description provided
Proper CPV code assigned
Multiple relevant documents attached

Concerns

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated project value to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria for bidder assessment.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability criteria into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline