Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems (MEP) and fit-out works at Bispebjerg Hospital

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00168717-2026
Value
kr1,240,000,000
Location
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Budget
kr1,240,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Hovedstaden
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Agreement involves assisting the Client with the completion of various works at the New Hospital Bispebjerg, specifically the new acute care facilities ("Nyt Hospital Bispebjerg"), which will form part of the Nyt Hospital and New Psykiatri Bispebjerg complex located on Bispebjerg Bakke, Copenhagen NV, Denmark. This contract encompasses the technical services such as installation, coordination, and completion of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems as well as fit-out works essential

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-14 21:59:59.
--The contracting entity is entitled to decide whether fit-out related works are to be removed from the scope of this procurement process either in part or in its entirety during the dialogue phase.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific grounds listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must be able to assist the Client with the completion of various works at the New Hospital Bispebjerg.
--Must be capable of undertaking installation, coordination, and completion of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems.
--Must be capable of undertaking fit-out works essential to the hospital’s infrastructure.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific technical capability requirements listed in the provided text, beyond the general scope of works]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific financial requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for MEP and fit-out works at Bispebjerg Hospital is generally well-structured with a high estimated value and clear scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed financial/technical requirements, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement principles with a clear procedure type (Open Procedure) and a proper CPV code. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the project's scale. No disputes are indicated. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the organization and location.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is reasonably clear, outlining the scope of MEP and fit-out services for the new hospital facilities. The ECI approach and two-phase structure are mentioned. However, specific evaluation criteria are missing, which could lead to ambiguity in the selection process.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are present. The CPV code is provided. However, crucial details like contract duration, specific financial requirements, and detailed technical capability requirements are missing from the provided text, reducing overall completeness.

Missing contract duration
No specific financial requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the use of e-procurement is noted. However, the absence of specified objective evaluation criteria and the potential for the contracting entity to unilaterally alter the scope during the dialogue phase could be perceived as less fair.

Potential for scope alteration during dialogue phase
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a URL for external documents, which aids practicality. However, the lack of a clear contract start date and detailed financing information, along with the absence of explicit e-submission instructions (beyond the general e-procurement mention), slightly hinders practical application.

No explicit e-submission instructions
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are populated. The dates provided are logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The CPV and NUTS codes are consistent with the project description.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project's nature (hospital construction) might inherently involve some sustainable practices, these are not highlighted as specific requirements or evaluation criteria.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

High estimated value and significant project scope
Clear procedure type (Open Procedure)
E-procurement mentioned
CPV and NUTS codes provided

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed financial and technical requirements
Potential for scope alteration during dialogue phase
Absence of explicit sustainability criteria

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide detailed financial and technical capability requirements.
3. Clarify the process and conditions for potential scope alterations during the dialogue phase.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline