Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of explanatory report and reconstruction of pontoon walkways, construction of entrances/exits in Carnikava

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168462
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 17, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
5 months
Location
Pieriga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Development of explanatory report and reconstruction of pontoon walkways, construction of entrances/exits in Carnikava
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Registration
--Experience
--Qualified personnel
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Development of an explanatory report
--Reconstruction of pontoon jetties
--Construction of access ramps
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168462_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260317142549.pdf -- 107.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development of an explanatory report and reconstruction of pontoon jetties in Carnikava, including eligibility criteria for bidders such as registration, experience, and qualified personnel.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender ĀNP 2026/43, which involves the development of an explanatory report and the reconstruction of pontoon jetties with access ramps in Carnikava.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction and design work in Carnikava is generally well-structured, with clear technical requirements and EU funding indicated. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable weaknesses.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and appears to be compliant with general procurement regulations. A CPV code is provided, and the presence of EU funding suggests adherence to EU directives. No disputes are reported.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works (explanatory report, jetty reconstruction, ramp construction) is clear. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are outlined. However, a lack of specified evaluation criteria reduces overall clarity.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Basic tender information is present, including title, reference, organization, and contract duration. Two documents are provided, one outlining tender requirements. However, the estimated financial value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with EU funding, promoting broad participation. Eligibility criteria are standard. However, the issue of restricted document access and the absence of disclosed evaluation criteria may impact perceived fairness and objective comparison.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is positive. A contract start date is not explicitly stated, and financing information is not detailed beyond 'EU Funded'. The absence of information regarding e-submission in the provided details is a minor concern.

No e-submission specified
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and no disputes are recorded, indicating good data consistency. The dates provided are logically sequential.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'EU Funded', which often implies some level of sustainability considerations. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text, limiting its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical requirements
EU Funded status indicated
Open procurement procedure
Active status with no disputes

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value to improve transparency.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline