Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction of Eksporta Street infrastructure and rehabilitation works in the Liepāja Industrial Park territory

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168854
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 22, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 22, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction of Eksporta Street infrastructure and rehabilitation works in the Liepāja Industrial Park territory
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted in the specified format.
--All required documentation must be included.
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-20T10:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not be subject to any of the mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered and authorized to perform the works.
--Bidders must possess the necessary permits and licenses.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in similar construction and renovation projects.
--Bidders must provide details of their technical personnel and equipment.
--Bidders must submit a detailed work plan.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial capacity to undertake the project.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168854_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260322165517.pdf -- 97.3 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in the procurement for the construction and renovation of export street infrastructure in the Liepaja Industrial Park, including necessary documentation and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums un pielikumiDOC
Nolikums_2026_3_Eksporta_iela_Izbuve.docx -- 91.1 KB

This document contains the regulations and appendices for an open tender concerning the construction and renovation of export street infrastructure in the Liepaja Industrial Park, outlining submission requirements and evaluation criteria.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender LSEZ 2026/3, concerning the construction and renovation of export street infrastructure in the Liepāja Industrial Park, with a submission deadline of April 20, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for infrastructure construction and renovation in the Liepaja Industrial Park presents a generally well-structured procurement process with clear technical requirements. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria slightly impacts its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender follows an open procedure with a reasonable submission deadline and proper CPV code classification. There is no indication of disputes. The general regulatory compliance appears satisfactory, although specific details on legal frameworks are not explicitly detailed in the provided summary.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements outline key aspects like exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities. Document summaries indicate the presence of technical specifications and project requirements, contributing to clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. The duration of the contract is also missing. Three tender documents are available.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The AI-extracted requirements are objective. However, the issue flagged regarding 'restricted document access' raises concerns about full document accessibility for all potential bidders. The absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria also impacts perceived fairness.

Restricted document access (flagged)
No evaluation criteria specified (flagged)
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies an e-procurement system for submission. A clear submission deadline is provided. However, the AI-extracted information notes 'No e-submission' which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, suggesting a potential inconsistency or manual submission in parts. Financing details and contract start date are not explicitly mentioned.

Potential contradiction: 'No e-submission' vs 'E-Procurement' characteristic
Financing information not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference number, organization, and deadlines are populated and appear logically consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for reveal, submission, and opening are structured logically.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is flagged as 'EU Funded' but lacks specific mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided details, limiting its sustainability score. While EU funding often implies adherence to certain standards, explicit commitments are not visible.

No explicit green procurement criteria mentioned
No explicit social aspects mentioned

Strengths

Clear technical and eligibility requirements
Open procedure with reasonable deadlines
E-Procurement system utilized
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Potential restricted document access
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria to ensure a fair competition.
3. Confirm and detail the document access procedure to ensure full accessibility for all bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline