Skip to main content
Tenders

Development of Land Adjoining No.44 Gladstone Road, Land North And South Of Granville Road, Maidstone, Kent ME14 2BJ

Open
Deadline
45 days left
May 11, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
023231-2026
Value
£9,600,000
Location
Kent, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 04, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 11, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 12, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£9,600,000
Duration
14 months
Location
Kent
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Maidstone Borough Council is looking to appoint a contractor to provide high quality design and construction works to deliver new affordable housing schemes. The development proposals will deliver the redevelopment of Granville House and the former R J Kingsland warehouses to deliver 18 units with associated car parking and landscaping.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--*
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--*
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--*
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--*

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents a moderate to good quality opportunity for building construction work, with clear objectives and a substantial estimated value. However, there are concerns regarding the accessibility of full documentation and the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which slightly detract from its overall effectiveness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements, including a clear procedure and appropriate CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there are no reported disputes or regulatory issues. The absence of a reveal date is a minor omission.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the need for affordable housing schemes through redevelopment. While core requirements are implied by the project's nature, specific technical criteria and evaluation methods are not explicitly detailed within this summary.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and start date are provided. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. However, the lack of content for the tender documents and no AI-extracted requirements listed detract from its completeness.

No document content available
No AI-extracted requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the estimated value is disclosed. The use of an e-sourcing portal generally promotes accessibility. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency on evaluation criteria.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes an e-sourcing portal for access and response, which is a positive aspect. However, the provided information does not detail the contract start date, nor does it explicitly mention financing information. While documents are available via URL, their lack of immediate content impacts practicality.

No explicit financing information mentioned
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Essential fields like title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided (submission deadline, contract start, duration) are logically aligned. The CPV code is also correctly specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement policies, social aspects, or innovation focus. It also does not state that it is EU funded, suggesting limited integration of sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project objective and scope
Substantial estimated value
Use of e-sourcing portal
Open procedure for broad participation

Concerns

Lack of accessible tender document content
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Limited explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full content for all tender documents.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for submissions.
3. Consider incorporating specific sustainability or social value requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline