Skip to main content
Tenders

Medical waste removal service

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168212
Value
€1,547,107
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 15, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 15, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Tender Opening

April 24, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,547,107
Duration
36 months
Location
Riga
Type
Services
65
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€336,807
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
3,844 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Medical waste removal service

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements provided.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements provided.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168212_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260315110233.pdf -- 104.8 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for medical waste removal services, detailing necessary documentation and conditions for participation.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_35.docx -- 113.1 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for medical waste removal services, ID No. PSKUS 2026/35, issued by VSIA "Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca".

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a tender for medical waste removal services issued by Paula Stradiņa Clinical University Hospital.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

65
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for medical waste removal services presents a solid foundation with clear basic information and compliance with e-procurement, but lacks detailed requirements and sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, featuring a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable for an open procedure. Compliance with general regulations is assumed but not explicitly detailed.

Clarity60/100

While the title and basic description are clear, the tender suffers from a significant lack of specific documented requirements regarding eligibility, technical capability, and financial standing. The absence of evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue.

No specific requirements provided for eligibility, technical capability, or financial standing.
No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and dates. However, the critical omission of specific mandatory requirements for bidders impacts the completeness of the tender documentation for potential participants.

Mandatory exclusion grounds are mentioned but not detailed.
No specific requirements provided for eligibility, technical capability, or financial standing.
Fairness65/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The estimated value is disclosed. However, the lack of specified objective criteria for evaluation and potentially restricted access to full documentation raises concerns about fairness.

Restricted document access (implied by issues section).
No evaluation criteria specified.
Practicality50/100

The tender is advertised as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission,' which is a contradiction and significant practical drawback. The absence of specific contract start dates within the provided data also impacts practicality.

Contradiction regarding e-submission mentioned in issues.
Contract start date not explicitly specified.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are consistently populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The logical flow of dates appears sound.

Sustainability20/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender characteristics or documentation summaries. This indicates a complete lack of sustainability focus.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear basic information and title.
E-Procurement compliance.
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration.
Proper CPV code provided.

Concerns

Lack of detailed eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
Absence of specified evaluation criteria.
Potential for restricted document access.
No sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Clearly define all mandatory and optional eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements.
2. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure fairness and transparency.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability elements (e.g., environmental certifications, social impact) into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline