Skip to main content
Tenders

Westfield Primary School - Pipework Replacement Phase 3 & Window Replacement Phase 2 to Junior wing WC Upgrade to G105 & G109

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
016777-2026
Value
£732,000
Location
North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 24, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£732,000
Duration
4 months
Location
North Yorkshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The City of York Council has an opportunity for Westfield Primary School - Pipework Replacement Phase 3 & Window Replacement Phase 2 to Junior wing WC Upgrade to G105 & G109

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a clear scope for construction work with a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed documentation and specific evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and no reported disputes. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition'. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline's adequacy is a point of concern.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is straightforward, and the AI-extracted requirements list key areas. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are present. However, the critical issue of 'Documents with content/summaries: 0' significantly hinders completeness, as bidders cannot access the full scope of requirements without these documents.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and criteria are generally objective, although the lack of specified evaluation criteria is a drawback. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the lack of document content reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and estimated value disclosed
Open competition procedure
Basic CPV code provided

Concerns

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Potential for short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documentation with detailed content.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline