Skip to main content
Tenders

Construction supervision of construction works for the improvement of Kalupes park territory in Kalupē, Augšdaugava municipality – 1st phase

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
167427
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latgale, Latvia
Published
March 10, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
economically most advantageous offer based solely on price100%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 10, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Latgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Construction supervision of construction works for the improvement of Kalupes park territory in Kalupē, Augšdaugava municipality – 1st phase
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--The document outlines requirements for submitting a bid for construction supervision services.
--The evaluation criterion is the economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The document outlines exclusion conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The document outlines selection criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The document outlines technical proposal requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The document outlines financial proposal requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167427_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260310052032.pdf -- 96.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a bid for construction supervision services for the Kalupes park landscaping project, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums ar pielikumiem, t.sk.līguma projektsDOC
NOLIKUMS_ANPCP_2026_20_Kalupes_parks_buvuzrau... -- 161.8 KB

This document contains the regulations and contract draft for an open tender for construction supervision services for the Kalupes park landscaping project, with the evaluation criterion being the economically most advantageous offer based solely on price.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender for construction supervision services for the Kalupes park landscaping project in Augšdaugava municipality, Latvia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for construction supervision services is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable deadline. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria beyond price are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures, including a clear CPV code and a reasonable submission deadline. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements indicates a structured legal framework. The 'active' status and absence of disputes suggest regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the core requirements for submission, eligibility, and technical/financial proposals are outlined in the provided documents. The evaluation criterion being solely price is explicitly stated, contributing to clarity on that aspect.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, type of service, and a clear deadline. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration missing
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. The evaluation criterion being solely price, while clear, might limit competition if other factors are equally important. The primary concern is the 'Restricted document access' flag, which could hinder full document access for potential bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential manual submission process, which is less practical. The absence of financing information and contract start date also reduces practicality.

No e-submission indicated
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender is active with no reported disputes, and the dates appear logical. The tender validity period is specified.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear CPV code and classification
Active status with no disputes
Reasonable submission deadline
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria beyond price
Restricted document access
Potential for manual submission (no e-submission)

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the procurement.
2. Clarify evaluation criteria beyond price, if applicable.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline