Skip to main content
Tenders

Purchase of a mobile fire fighting training tower with fencing

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168850
Value
€55,720
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€55,720
Duration
4 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,726
Avg. Bids
1.9
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
2,311 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Purchase of a mobile fire fighting training tower with fencing

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Submission requirements as detailed in 'Main tender page' and 'Nolikums ar pielikumiem']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Exclusion grounds as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Eligibility requirements as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Technical capability requirements for the mobile fire-fighting sports tower with fencing as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Financial requirements as detailed in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168850_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324163438.pdf -- 94.9 KB

This document contains the procurement requirements for the acquisition of a mobile fire-fighting sports tower with fencing, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
2026_23_Nolikums.docx -- 7.4 MB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender by the State Fire and Rescue Service for the purchase of a mobile fire fighting sports tower with fencing.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the purchase of a mobile firefighting sports tower with fencing, including details on the contracting authority, subject matter, deadlines, and submission requirements.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for a mobile fire-fighting sports tower is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. Regulatory compliance is assumed unless otherwise indicated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the procurement subject is clear. Key requirements are referenced in attached documents, though the specific criteria within those documents are not fully detailed in the summary. The conditions for performance are stated to be in the technical specification and contract draft.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the explicit mention of 'No evaluation criteria specified' in the issues section suggests a potential gap in completeness regarding how bids will be assessed.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement characteristics, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential fairness issue, as full document access is crucial for equitable participation.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect for practicality. Financing information is provided through the project name. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission in the 'Issues' section, coupled with the 'Restricted document access', might hinder practical application.

Potential issues with e-submission clarity
Restricted document access
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, and value are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, and the dates provided are logical. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is funded by a cross-border cooperation program, indicating a potential for broader impact. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, leading to a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Open procedure with e-procurement
Disclosed estimated value and reasonable deadlines
CPV code provided
Financing source identified

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability criteria (green, social, innovation)

Recommendations

1. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria within the tender documentation.
3. Consider incorporating explicit sustainability objectives if aligned with project goals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline