Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

NCC1811 - Willowburn Leisure Centre Boiler Replacement Works

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027308-2026
Value
£144,000
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 21, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£144,000
Duration
3 months
Location
Northumberland and Tyne and Wear
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Northumberland County Council are seeking to appoint a contactor to carry out the replacement of the Gas Boiler Plant at Willowburn Leisure Centre, Willowburn Avenue, Alnwick, Northumberland. NE66 2JH.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for boiler replacement works at Willowburn Leisure Centre is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific requirements and evaluation criteria, impacting its completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the provision of a CPV code and a clear procedure for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, and there are no reported disputes. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear and concise. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand the assessment process.

No evaluation criteria specified
No specific requirements listed for eligibility, technical capability, financial, or submission
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration, and start date. However, the lack of detailed requirements and the unavailability of document content (only a count is provided) significantly reduce its completeness.

No document content available
No specific requirements listed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The lack of specific tailored requirements for companies is positive. However, the absence of e-submission and detailed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair.

No e-submission
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender provides essential information such as contract duration, start date, and financing context (implied by estimated value). However, the lack of e-submission and the short submission deadline reduce its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and financial details
Open competition procedure
CPV code provided
Value disclosed

Concerns

Lack of specific requirements and evaluation criteria
No document content available
No e-submission
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for assessing bids.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission system and review the submission deadline.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline