Skip to main content
Tenders

Invitation to Tender for Cawston C of E Primary Academy Playground

Open
Deadline
27 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026767-2026
Value
£72,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 19, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£72,000
Duration
2 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Diocese of Norwich Education Services Company (DoNESC) is carrying out a procurement exercise on the behalf of DNEAT for Cawston Primary Academy to repair drainage and resurfacing of the main school playground.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-24T00:00:00.
--The tender is for resurfacing and drainage repair of the main school playground at Cawston Primary Academy.
--The duration for the works is 2 months.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be capable of undertaking resurfacing works.
--Bidders must be able to repair drainage.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Experience in resurfacing works.
--Experience in repairing school playground drainage.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The estimated value of the tender is 72000.0 EUR.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for playground resurfacing and drainage repair is generally well-structured with clear basic information. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for open competition below the threshold. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works (drainage repair and resurfacing of a school playground) is clear. The AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary capabilities. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves a gap in understanding how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible tender documents with content or summaries significantly hinders completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully detailed, are focused on technical capability (resurfacing, drainage repair). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents reduces its practicality for bidders. Financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL missing
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of a tender process.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Open competition procedure
Disclosure of estimated value
Appropriate CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of accessible tender documents
No e-submission specified
Limited sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Make tender documents readily accessible with clear URLs and content summaries.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline