Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of the bathroom on the ground floor of the District Court building in Rzeszów

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00164059/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Podkarpackie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
Podkarpackie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of the bathroom on the ground floor of the District Court building in Rzeszów

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de865f-a58c-d8ea-056e-e50001aa8910.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the renovation of a bathroom on the ground floor of the District Court in Rzeszów, outlining the scope of work, evaluation criteria, and submission requirements.

SWZ - IR.261.2.2026.pdfPDF
SWZ - IR.261.2.2026.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Public Procurement Conditions (SWZ) for the renovation of a bathroom on the ground floor of the District Court in Rzeszów.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bathroom renovation is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and sustainability, and the estimated value is not disclosed.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a clear CPV code and a specified procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The main weakness is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant aspect of legal compliance in public procurement.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the work is clear, and the attached documents (SWZ and annexes) are expected to contain detailed requirements. The CPV code is correctly specified. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria impacts overall clarity.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are explicitly marked as 'No information', which significantly impacts completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness85/100

The tender is characterized as E-Procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. Deadlines appear reasonable. The absence of specific evaluation criteria and detailed requirements for bidders could be seen as a lack of objective criteria, but the lack of tailored requirements to specific companies is a positive aspect.

Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. While it is marked as E-Procurement, the 'Issues' section notes 'No e-submission', which is a contradiction and a significant practical concern. The contract start date is not specified.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is present. No disputes or suspensions are indicated. Dates are logical. The main inconsistency is the 'No information' for several requirement categories while the tender is active.

Sustainability50/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and location specified
CPV code provided
Documents attached and analyzed
E-Procurement characteristic noted

Concerns

Significant lack of detail in requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Specify the evaluation criteria clearly.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline