Sexual Violence Support Service for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

The tender is well-structured with clear technical requirements, but lacks specific financial and evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and potentially fairness. The e-submission process is outlined but not explicitly stated as a modern platform.

The tender follows an open procedure and provides a clear CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline may be perceived as short given the contract value. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is presumed but not explicitly detailed.

The description of the service required is clear, specifying the target audience and scope. The AI-extracted requirements are well-defined. However, the absence of evaluation criteria leads to some ambiguity in how proposals will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and start date. However, crucial details such as specific financial requirements for bidders and the full content of tender documents are missing, reducing overall completeness.

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. Criteria are not explicitly detailed, which could be a point of concern. The use of a specific supplier portal is mentioned, which is generally positive for e-procurement, but the fairness is impacted by the lack of explicit evaluation criteria.

The submission process is described, involving registration and navigation on a supplier portal. A URL is provided for the portal. The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not detailed, and the e-submission, while functional, is not presented as a highly modern or streamlined platform.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no noted disputes or suspensions. The dates are consistent and allow for the specified contract start.

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This absence results in a low score for sustainability.