Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Provision of Planned Preventative Maintenance for Air Compressors at The Pirbright Institute

Open
Deadline
26 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026912-2026
Value
£299,466
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£299,466
Duration
36 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Project Background The contract is for single supplier for the provision of Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM) services for the Institute’s compressed air systems. 1.1 The proposed contract will: 1.2 Ensure statutory and regulatory compliance 1.3 Safeguard operational resilience across the estate 1.4 Deliver cost predictability through planned maintenance 1.5 Enhance asset lifecycle management and performance monitoring Scope of requirement The scope shall include, as a minimum: • Two service visits per compressor per annum (one minor and one major service unless otherwise specified) • Servicing in full compliance with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) requirements • Service dates agreed in advance between The Pirbright Institute Maintenance Scheduler and the Contractor’s nominated point of contact • Alignment of service delivery with the Institute’s planned building shutdown schedules, recognising that servicing may need to be phased rather than delivered in a single continuous visit • Assurance that compressed air supply remains operational at all times during servicing, achieved through the appropriate management of secondary/backup compressors and receivers • Provision of a dedicated engineer (or core engineering team), with a commitment to obtaining the necessary site security clearance to permit independent and unescorted working where authorised • Engineers suitably qualified and competent to sign off maintenance documentation before and after servicing, breakdown attendance, or additional works • Proactive notification to the Client where any of the following require repair or replacement: air ends, compressor auto drains, flexible pipework • Replacement of consumables within the defined service scope • Inspection of associated dryers, filtration systems, pipework, receivers, and safety devices • Digital service reporting provided at the point of service, detailing works undertaken, findings, recommendations, and asset condition • Emergency call-out provision with a target four-hour response time for critical assets Manufacturers in Scope The estate includes equipment manufactured by: • Atlas Copco • CompAir • Hydrovane • Busch Vacuum Solutions • Beko Technologies • HPC • Hi-Line • JORC 1.8 Compliance Requirements The Contractor must ensure compliance with: • Pressure Systems Safety Regulations 2000 • Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 • Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 • Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 The Contractor shall: • Provide RAMS for each visit • Maintain appropriate insurances • Ensure engineer competence and certification • Operate within site security protocols including accessing contained areas.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (4)
Technical (13)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Provide RAMS for each visit.
--Operate within site security protocols including accessing contained areas.
--Deadline for submission: 2026-04-30T12:00:00+01:00
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds mentioned, but implied to be general exclusion criteria for public tenders.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--Must be a single supplier.
--Must be able to provide Planned Preventative Maintenance (PPM) services for compressed air systems.
--Must be able to obtain necessary site security clearance for independent and unescorted working.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS13
--Two service visits per compressor per annum (one minor and one major service unless otherwise specified).
--Servicing in full compliance with original equipment manufacturer (OEM) requirements.
--Service dates to be agreed in advance with The Pirbright Institute Maintenance Scheduler.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--Value of contract: 299465.6 EUR
--Duration of contract: 36 months
--Must maintain appropriate insurances.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall practicality and legal compliance.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general public procurement principles with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern, as it might not fully align with all regulatory expectations for transparency in award decisions. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is detailed and comprehensive, outlining specific tasks, compliance requirements, and expected outcomes. The scope of work is well-defined, and the list of manufacturers in scope provides good clarity for potential bidders. Requirements are documented clearly.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the tender documents themselves are not accessible or summarized, which significantly impacts completeness. The absence of explicit evaluation criteria also contributes to a lack of completeness in the award process information.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements, while specific to the service, do not appear to be tailored to a single company. The list of manufacturers is broad enough to allow multiple suppliers to bid. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly stated as mandatory for submission.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission methods and the absence of accessible tender documents significantly hinder practicality. The deadline, while not flagged as a primary concern per rules, is relatively short for a 36-month contract, potentially impacting the ability of bidders to prepare comprehensive submissions.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are populated logically. Dates for contract start and submission deadline are provided and appear consistent. There are no noted disputes or suspensions.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation requirements. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed scope of work
Well-defined technical requirements
Open procedure for broad participation
Disclosure of estimated value and contract duration

Concerns

Lack of accessible tender documents
Absence of explicit evaluation criteria
Unclear e-submission process
No sustainability considerations mentioned

Recommendations

1. Provide access to all tender documents with clear summaries.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Specify the e-submission platform and process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline